The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Radiographic abnormalities and exposure to asbestos-contaminated vermiculite in the community of Libby, Montana, USA.
Abstract
Mining, handling, processing, and personal or commercial use of asbestos-contaminated vermiculite have led to widespread contamination of the Libby, Montana, area. We initiated a medical testing program in response to reports of respiratory illness in the community. The purpose of this analysis was to identify and quantify asbestos-related radiographic abnormalities among persons exposed to vermiculite in Libby and to examine associations between these outcomes and participants' self-reported exposures. A cross-sectional interview and medical testing were conducted in Libby from July through November 2000 and from July through September 2001. A total of 7,307 persons who had lived, worked, or played in Libby for at least 6 months before 31 December 1990 completed the interview. Of those, 6,668 participants > or = 18 years of age received chest radiographs to assess the prevalence of pleural and interstitial abnormalities. We observed pleural abnormalities in 17.8% of participants and interstitial abnormalities in < 1% of participants undergoing chest radiography. We examined 29 occupational, recreational, household, and other exposure pathways in the analysis. The prevalence of pleural abnormalities increased with increasing number of exposure pathways, ranging from 6.7% for those who reported no apparent exposures to 34.6% for those who reported > or = 12 pathways. The factors most strongly associated with pleural abnormalities were being a former W.R. Grace worker, being older, having been a household contact of a W.R. Grace worker, and being a male. In addition to being a former W.R. Grace worker, environmental exposures and other nonoccupational risk factors were also important predictors of asbestos-related radiographic abnormalities.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Pleural abnormality N = 358”
From Domestic asbestos exposure: a review of epidemiologic and exposure data (2013) · cites this paper as [71]
In the citing paper
“Using logistic regression”
From Domestic asbestos exposure: a review of epidemiologic and exposure data (2013) · cites this paper as [71]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Multicentric study on malignant pleural mesothelioma and non-occupational exposure to asbestos
Magnani, C., Agudo, A., González, C. A., Andrion, A., Calleja, A., Chellini, E., Dalmasso, P., Escolar, A., Hernandez, S., Ivaldi, C., et al. (2000) · British Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1054/bjoc.2000.1161 · Cited by 175
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Asbestos-induced lung diseases: an update
Kamp, D. W. (2009) · Translational Research · doi:10.1016/j.trsl.2009.01.004 · Cited by 251
Baumann, F., Buck, B. J., Metcalf, R. V., McLaurin, B. T., Merkler, D. J., & Carbone, M. (2015) · Journal of Thoracic Oncology · doi:10.1097/jto.0000000000000506 · Cited by 128
Mapping the risk of mesothelioma due to neighborhood asbestos exposure
Kurumatani, N., & Kumagai, S. (2008) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/rccm.200801-063oc · Cited by 126
Case, B. W., Abraham, J. L., Meeker, G., Pooley, F. D., & Pinkerton, K. E. (2011) · Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part B · doi:10.1080/10937404.2011.556045 · Cited by 123
Domestic asbestos exposure: a review of epidemiologic and exposure data
Goswami, E., Craven, V., Dahlstrom, D., Alexander, D., & Mowat, F. (2013) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph10115629 · Cited by 92
The health impact of nonoccupational exposure to asbestos: what do we know?
Goldberg, M., & Luce, D. (2009) · European Journal of Cancer Prevention · doi:10.1097/cej.0b013e32832f9bee · Cited by 85
Environmental exposure to Libby asbestos and mesotheliomas
Whitehouse, A. C., Black, C. B., Heppe, M. S., Ruckdeschel, J., & Levin, S. M. (2008) · American Journal of Industrial Medicine · doi:10.1002/ajim.20620 · Cited by 86
Hilbert, T. J., Franzblau, A., Dunning, K. K., Borton, E. K., Rohs, A. M., & Lockey, J. E. (2013) · Journal of Occupational & Environmental Medicine · doi:10.1097/jom.0b013e31829fcf1a · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Peipins, L. A., Lewin, M., Campolucci, S., Lybarger, J. A., Miller, A., Middleton, D., Weis, C., Spence, M., Black, B., & Kapil, V.
- Affiliations
- Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, Atlanta, Georgia 30333, USA.
- Venue
- Environmental Health Perspectives
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2003-11-01
- Volume
- 111
- Issue
- 14
- Pages
- 1753-1759
- ISSN
- 0091-6765
- 1552-9924
- PMC
- PMC1241719
- Cited by
- 133
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review