Cited by 114Arsenic contamination and mitigationCarcinogens and Genotoxicity AssessmentSkin Protection and Aging

Arsenic-Induced Enhancement of Ultraviolet Radiation Carcinogenesis in Mouse Skin: A Dose-Response Study

Open access
Burns, Fredric J, Uddin, Ahmed N, Wu, Feng, Nádas, Arthur, Rossman, Toby G·2004·Environmental Health Perspectives

Abstract

The present study was designed to establish the form of the dose-response relationship for dietary sodium arsenite as a co-carcinogen with ultraviolet radiation (UVR) in a mouse skin model. Hairless mice (strain Skh1) were fed sodium arsenite continuously in drinking water starting at 21 days of age at concentrations of 0.0, 1.25, 2.5, 5.0, and 10 mg/L. At 42 days of age, solar spectrum UVR exposures were applied three times weekly to the dorsal skin at 1.0 kJ/m2 per exposure until the experiment ended at 182 days. Untreated mice and mice fed only arsenite developed no tumors. In the remaining groups a total of 322 locally invasive squamous carcinomas occurred. The carcinoma yield in mice exposed only to UVR was 2.4 +/- 0.5 cancers/mouse at 182 days. Dietary arsenite markedly enhanced the UVR-induced cancer yield in a pattern consistent with linearity up to a peak of 11.1 +/- 1.0 cancers/mouse at 5.0 mg/L arsenite, representing a peak enhancement ratio of 4.63 +/- 1.05. A decline occurred to 6.8 +/- 0.8 cancers/mouse at 10.0 mg/L arsenite. New cancer rates exhibited a consistent-with-linear dependence on time beginning after initial cancer-free intervals ranging between 88 and 95 days. Epidermal hyperplasia was elevated by arsenite alone and UVR alone and was greater than additive for the combined exposures as were growth rates of the cancers. These results demonstrate the usefulness of a new animal model for studying the carcinogenic action of dietary arsenite on skin exposed to UVR and should contribute to understanding how to make use of animal data for assessment of human cancer risks in tissues exposed to mixtures of carcinogens and cancer-enhancing agents.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1289/ehp.6655

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 38 · Cited by 114

Authors
Burns, F. J., Uddin, A. N., Wu, F., Nádas, A., & Rossman, T. G.
Affiliations
  • New York University (US)
  • Department of Environmental Medicine, School of Medicine, New York University, 57 Old Forge Road, Tuxedo, NY 10987, USA. burns2@env.med.nyu.edu
Venue
Environmental Health Perspectives
Published
2004-04-01
Volume
112
Issue
5
Pages
599-603
ISSN
  • 0091-6765 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-9924
OpenAlex
W2093616797
Cited by
114
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
FWCI
8.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Environmental Health Perspectives (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01es009252-03)
  • National Cancer Institute (CA16087, P30CA016087)
  • National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (ES 09252, ES00260, ES 10344, P42ES010344, P30ES000260)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Arsenic contamination and mitigation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Skin Protection and Aging
Keywords
sodium arsenite, arsenic, ultraviolet radiation, skin carcinogenesis, cocarcinogenesis, dose-response relationship, squamous cell carcinoma, epidermal hyperplasia, cancer risk assessment
MeSH terms
Animals, Carcinogens, Environmental, Carcinoma, Squamous Cell, Cocarcinogenesis, Disease Models, Animal, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Epidermis, Hyperplasia, Mice, Hairless, Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced, Skin Neoplasms, Ultraviolet Rays, Water Pollutants, Chemical, Arsenites, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review