Cited by 171Environmental Toxicology and EcotoxicologyRegulation and Compliance StudiesAgricultural safety and regulations

Chemical mixtures: considering the evolution of toxicology and chemical assessment

Open access
Monosson, Emily·2005·Environmental Health Perspectives

Abstract

The assessment of chemical mixtures is a complex topic for toxicologists, regulators, and the public. In this article the linkage between the science of toxicology and the needs of governmental regulatory agencies in the United States is explored through an overview of environmental regulations enacted over the past century and a brief history of modern toxicology. One of the goals of this overview is to encourage both regulators and scientists to consider the benefits and limitations of this science-regulatory relationship as they tackle existing issues such as chemical mixtures. It is clear that a) over the past 100 years chemical regulation and toxicologic research, have in large part, shared a common emphasis on characterization and regulation of individual chemicals. But chemical mixtures have been, and continue to be, evaluated at hazardous waste sites around the United States. For this reason the current U.S. Environmental Protection Agency guidelines for chemical mixtures assessment are also reviewed. These guidelines highlight the current practice of mixtures assessment, which relies primarily on the existing single-chemical database. It is also clear that b) the science and assessment of chemical mixtures are moving forward through the combined efforts of regulatory agencies and scientists from a broad range of disciplines, including toxicology. Because toxicology is at this exciting crossroads, particular attention should be paid to the forces (e.g., public demands, regulatory needs, funding, academic interests) that both promote and limit the growth of this expanding discipline.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1289/ehp.6987

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Many authors have strongly emphasized the necessity of studying the potential toxic effects of total chemical mixtures rather than single components.

    “many authors in the field have strongly emphasized the necessity of studying the potential toxic effects of total chemical mixtures rather than single components (Cox and Surgan, 2006;Mesnage et al., 2010;Monosson, 2005).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 58 · Cited by 171

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. ACGIH 2004. History. Cincinnati, OH:American Conference Governmental Industrial Hygienists. Available: http://www.acgih.org/About/history.htm [accessed 22 January 2004].
  2. Burns J Conney A 1974. Drug interactions: historical aspects and perspectives. In: Drug Interactions (Morselli P, Garattini S, Cohen S, eds). New York:Raven Press, 1–9.
  3. Gallo M 1996. History and scope of toxicology. In: Cassarett and Doull’s Toxicology. The Basic Science of Poisons (Klassen CD, ed). 5th ed. New York:McGraw-Hill, 3–11.
  4. National Research Council 1997. The National Research Council’s Committee on Toxicology: The First 50 Years, 1947–1997. Washington, DC:National Academy of Sciences Press. 25077198
  5. Parkinson A 1996. Biotranformation of xenobiotics. In: Cassarett and Doull’s Toxicology. The Basic Science of Poisons (Klassen CD, ed). 5th ed. New York:McGraw-Hill, 113–186.

Authors
Monosson, E.
Affiliations
Mount Holyoke College (US)
Corresponding author
Monosson, Emily
Venue
Environmental Health Perspectives
Published
2004-10-21
Volume
113
Issue
4
Pages
383-390
ISSN
  • 0091-6765 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-9924
OpenAlex
W2071515459
Cited by
171
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 13
FWCI
6.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Environmental Health Perspectives (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Regulation and Compliance Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Agricultural safety and regulations
Keywords
chemical mixtures, mixture toxicology, environmental regulation, history of toxicology, hazardous waste sites, chemical risk assessment
MeSH terms
Environmental Exposure, Environmental Pollutants, Toxicology, United States, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Xenobiotics, Risk Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review