Cited by 280Aluminum toxicity and tolerance in plants and animalsHeavy Metal Exposure and ToxicityThallium and Germanium Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Aluminum in the Environment and Human Health

Open access
Sorenson, John R. J., Campbell, Irene R., Tepper, Lloyd B., Lingg, Robert D.·1974·Environmental Health Perspectives

Abstract

The review of over 800 references on aluminum (Al) published since the mid-fifties covers the occurrence of Al in soil, air, water, plants and food products, as well as air and water pollution problems. In addition, the existing quality criteria, the biology and toxicology of Al, and the therapeutic and medical uses are presented. It is concluded that absorption and retention or accumulation of Al in humans occurs at lower levels of intake than had been assumed formerly. However, levels of 5 to 50 times the normal daily intake do not appear to interfere with other metabolic processes. The adverse effects of Al reported in the more recent years resulted from the inhalation or ingestion of Al in concentrations many times greater than the amounts present under normal circumstances. As in the past, there is still no need for concern by the public or producers of Al or its products concerning hazards to human health derived from well established and extensively used products.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1289/ehp.7483

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Sorenson, J. R. J., Campbell, I. R., Tepper, L. B., & Lingg, R. D.
Venue
Environmental Health Perspectives
Published
1974-08
Volume
8
Pages
3-95
ISSN
  • 0091-6765 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-9924
OpenAlex
W2036163418
Cited by
280
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 10
FWCI
2.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
public-domain
Locations
  • Environmental Health Perspectives (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Aluminum toxicity and tolerance in plants and animals
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Heavy Metal Exposure and Toxicity
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Thallium and Germanium Studies
Keywords
aluminum, human health, aluminum toxicity, air pollution, water pollution, soil contamination, food contamination, quality standards
MeSH terms
Air, Air Pollution, Aluminum, Animals, Beverages, Environmental Health, Food Analysis, Food Handling, Humans, Occupational Diseases, Organ Specificity, Plants, Soil, Water, Water Pollution, Chemical

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review