Cited by 34Sperm and Testicular FunctionEffects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicalsHeavy Metal Exposure and Toxicity

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Assessment of environmental factors affecting male fertility

Open access
Dixon, R. L., Sherins, R. J., Lee, I. P.·1979·Environmental Health Perspectives

Abstract

Exposure to drinking water containing as much as 500 ppm aluminum chloride for periods of 30, 60, and 90 days had no apparent effect on male reproductive processes. In an attempt to correlate enzyme activity with particular spermatogenic cell types, postnatal development of testicular enzymes was studied. Eight enzymes were selected: hyaluronidase (H), lactate dehydrogenase isoenzyme-X (LDH-X), dehydrogenases of sorbitol (SDH), alpha-glycerophosphate (GPDH), glucose-6-phosphate (G6PDH), malate (MDH), glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate (G3PDH), and isocitrate (ICDH). Enzyme specific activities in testicular homogenates were determined. Two types of enzyme developmental patterns were observed. One was represented by H, LDH-X, SDH, and GPDH; and the other by G6PDH, MDH, G3PDH, and ICDH. The former was characterized by a change in enzyme activities from low in newborn to high in adult while in the latter this pattern was reversed. The two complementary enzyme systems crossed each other at puberty. Prior to puberty, only spermatogonial cells are present; sperm differentiation initiated at puberty adds spermatocytes and spermatids to the testicular cell population. Male rats were exposed to borax in their diet for periods of 30 and 60 days. Concentrations of boron were 0, 500, 1000, and 2000 ppm. At the end of each experimental period, the specific activities of the selected enzymes were determined in the testis and prostate. Correlations of enzyme activity with testicular histology and androgen activities of the male accessory organs were sought. In addition, plasma FSH, LH, and testosterone levels were measured to assess pituitary-testicular interaction. Plasma and testicular boron concentrations were determined and a minimum boron concentration which induced germinal aplasia and male infertility was estimated. In both 30 and 60 day feeding studies, male rats receiving 500 ppm failed to demonstrate any significant adverse effects. In contrast, male rats receiving 100 and 2000 ppm boron displayed a significant loss of germinal elements, although most of the Leydig and Sertoli cells appeared normal. Testicular atrophy was associated with a decrease in seminiferous tubular diameter and a marked reduction of spermatocytes and spermatogenic cells. These morphologic alterations were associated with a concomitant reduction of H, SDH, and LDH-X specific activities. In contrast, the specific activities of G3PDH and MDH were significantly elevated above control. The increase in these enzyme activities can be attributed to the relative enrichment of spermatogonial cells during the loss of spermatocytes and spermiogenic cells. Boron-induced male germinal aplasia was also associated with significantly elevated plasma FSH while plasma LH and testosterone levels were not significantly altered. Plasma testosterone levels were unaltered. Male fertility studies demonstrated that at the 500 ppm boron level, fertility was unaffected. However, at 1000 and 2000 ppm boron, male fertility was significantly reduced. Most effects were reversible within 5 weeks. However, the male group receiving 2000 ppm boron for 60 days remained sterile. There was no dose-related decrease in litter size or fetal death in utero. Therefore, the boron-induced infertility was apparently not due to a dominant lethal effect but rather to germinal aplasia. Boron appears toxic to spermatogenic cells at testicular concentrations of 6-8 ppm.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1289/ehp.793053

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • No histological changes were observed in the hearts of rats given 70 mg Al/kg/day as Al chloride in drinking water for 30, 60, or 90 days.

    “No histological changes were observed in the hearts of rats given 70 mg Al/kg/day as Al chloride in drinking water for 30, 60, or 90 days (Dixon et al., 1979).”

    From Aluminium toxicosis: a review of toxic actions and effects (2019) · cites this paper as Dixon et al., 1979

    The Methods and Table 1 (p. 55) say that hearts were examined and rats received aluminum chloride in drinking water for 30, 60, or 90 days. The Discussion reports no treatment-related histopathologic lesions, but the paper does not report the claimed dose of 70 mg Al/kg/day; Table 1 gives drinking-water concentrations and anticipated absorbed doses instead. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

  • Aluminium toxicosis: a review of toxic actions and effects

    Igbokwe, I. O., Igwenagu, E., & Igbokwe, N. A. (2019) · Interdisciplinary Toxicology · doi:10.2478/intox-2019-0007 · Cited by 395

    “…no organ weight or histological changes in the lungs of rats exposed to 70 mg Al/kg/day as Al chloride in drinking water for 30, 60 or 90 days (Dixon et al., 1979), rats exposed to 133 mg Al/kg/day as Al nitrate in drinking water for 30 days (Gomez et al., 1986), rats and mice exposed to 0.6…”
    MethodInfluential

Metadata

Authors
Dixon, R. L., Sherins, R. J., & Lee, I. P.
Venue
Environmental Health Perspectives
Published
1979-06
Volume
30
Pages
53-68
ISSN
  • 0091-6765 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-9924
OpenAlex
W2027353609
Cited by
34
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
public-domain
Locations
  • Environmental Health Perspectives (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Sperm and Testicular Function
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Heavy Metal Exposure and Toxicity
Keywords
male fertility, environmental factors, aluminum chloride, drinking water exposure, testicular enzymes, spermatogenesis, boron, borax, testicular atrophy, Leydig cells, Sertoli cells, spermatocytes, follicle-stimulating hormone, luteinizing hormone, testosterone, male infertility, reproductive toxicology, rats
MeSH terms
Administration, Oral, Aging, Aluminum, Animals, Borates, Female, Fertility, Infertility, Male, Lead, Male, Pregnancy, Prostate, Spermatogenesis, Testis, Time Factors, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review