The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Effect of bronchopulmonary lavage on lung retention and clearance of particulate material in hamsters.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In rodents, there is evidence that rather constantly about 80% of micron-sized particles can be lavaged from the lung surface during six months post-exposure (p.e.) when the lavaged particle fractions are normalized to the contemporary lung burden at each time point [51–53].”
From Particle toxicology and health - where are we? (2019) · cites this paper as [53]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Deposition and biokinetics of inhaled nanoparticles
Geiser, M., & Kreyling, W. G. (2010) · Particle and Fibre Toxicology · doi:10.1186/1743-8977-7-2 · Cited by 747
Particle toxicology and health - where are we?
Riediker, M., Zink, D., Kreyling, W., Oberdörster, G., Elder, A., Graham, U., Lynch, I., Duschl, A., Ichihara, G., Ichihara, S., et al. (2019) · Particle and Fibre Toxicology · doi:10.1186/s12989-019-0302-8 · Cited by 237
Metadata
- Authors
- Ellender, M., Hodgson, A., Wood, K. L., & Moody, J. C.
- Venue
- Environmental Health Perspectives
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1992-07
- Volume
- 97
- Pages
- 209-213
- ISSN
- 0091-6765
- 1552-9924
- PMC
- PMC1519540
- Cited by
- 19
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effect of bronchopulmonary lavage on lung retention and clearance of particulate material in hamsters. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1289/ehp.9297209
- The paper
- Ellender, M., Hodgson, A., Wood, K. L., & Moody, J. C. (1992). Effect of bronchopulmonary lavage on lung retention and clearance of particulate material in hamsters. Environmental Health Perspectives. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.9297209
