Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 466

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Correlation between particle size, in vivo particle persistence, and lung injury

Open access
Oberdörster, G, Ferin, J, Lehnert, B E·1994·Environmental Health Perspectives

Abstract

Dosimetry parameters such as deposition, clearance, retention, and translocation and dissolution of inhaled particles in and to different lung compartments may be important for the persistence of particles in the lung and may correlate with adverse pulmonary effects.We investigated such correlations using a model involving TiO2 particles of two particle sizes (20 nm diameter, ultrafine; 250 nm diameter, fine) of the same crystalline structure (anatase).A 12-week inhalation experiment in rats resulted in a similar mass deposition of the two particle types in the lower respiratory tract.The ultrafine particles elicited a persistently high inflammatory reaction in the lungs of the animals compared to the larger-sized particles.In the postexposure period (up to 1 year) retention in the alveolar space per se was not different between fine and ultrafine TiO2.However, the following differences between the particle types were noted: a significantly different total pulmonary retention, both quantitatively (significantly prolonged retention of the ultrafine TiO2) and qualitatively (increased translocation to the pulmonary interstitium and persistence there of the ultrafine TiO2); greater epithelial effects (Type II cell proliferation; occlusion of pores of Kohn) and the beginning of interstitial fibrotic foci with ultrafine TiO2; signifi- cant sustained impairment of alveolar macrophage function after ultrafine TiO2 exposure as measured by the clearance of test particles.A correla- tion between particle surface area and effects was observed.A comparison of the adverse reactions with dosimetric parameters of TiO2 in different lung compartments in the postexposure period showed a correlation of the persistence of effects in both the alveolar and interstitial space with the persistence of particles in the respective compartment.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1289/ehp.94102s5173

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 466

Metadata

Authors
Oberdörster, G., Ferin, J., & Lehnert, B. E.
Venue
Environmental Health Perspectives
Published
1994-10-01
Volume
102
Issue
Suppl 5
Pages
173-179
ISSN
0091-6765 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4243027100
Cited by
466
References
0
FWCI
4.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Correlation between particle size, in vivo particle persistence, and lung injury. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1289/ehp.94102s5173
The paper
Oberdörster, G., Ferin, J., & Lehnert, B. E. (1994). Correlation between particle size, in vivo particle persistence, and lung injury. Environmental Health Perspectives. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.94102s5173

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.