The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Biological monitoring of organophosphorus pesticide exposure among children of agricultural workers in central Washington State.
Open accessAbstract
Children up to 6 years of age who lived with pesticide applicators were monitored for increased risk of pesticide exposure: 48 pesticide applicator and 14 reference families were recruited from an agricultural region of Washington State in June 1995. A total of 160 spot urine samples were collected from 88 children, including repeated measures 3-7 days apart. Samples were assayed by gas chromatography flame photometric detector for dimethylphosphate metabolites. Dimethylthiophosphate (DMTP) was the dominant metabolite. DMTP levels were significantly higher in applicator children than in reference children (p = 0.015), with median concentrations of 0.021 and 0.005 microg/ml, respectively; maximum concentrations were 0.44 and 0.10 microg/ml, respectively. Percentages of detectable samples were 47% for applicator children and 27% for reference children. A marginally significant trend of increasing concentration was observed with decreasing age among applicator children (p = 0.060), and younger children within these families had significantly higher concentrations when compared to their older siblings (p = 0.040). Applicator children living less than 200 feet from an orchard were associated with higher frequency of detectable DMTP levels than nonproximal applicator children (p =0.036). These results indicate that applicator children experienced higher organophosphorus pesticide exposures than did reference children in the same community and that proximity to spraying is an important contributor to such exposures. Trends related to age suggest that child activity is an important variable for exposure. It is unlikely that any of the observed exposures posed a hazard of acute intoxication. This study points to the need for a more detailed understanding of pesticide exposure pathways for children of agricultural workers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Roberts, E. M., English, P. B., Grether, J. K., Windham, G. C., Somberg, L., & Wolff, C. (2007) · Environmental Health Perspectives · doi:10.1289/ehp.10168 · Cited by 442
Lu, C., Fenske, R. A., Simcox, N. J., & Kalman, D. (2000) · Environmental Research · doi:10.1006/enrs.2000.4076 · Cited by 417
Self-citationTimchalk, C. (2002) · Toxicological Sciences · doi:10.1093/toxsci/66.1.34 · Cited by 285
A pilot study of children's exposure to CCA-treated wood from playground equipment
Shalat, S. L., Solo-Gabriele, H. M., Fleming, L. E., Buckley, B. T., Black, K., Jimenez, M., Shibata, T., Durbin, M., Graygo, J., & Stephan, W. (2006) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2006.01.002 · Cited by 48
Metadata
- Authors
- Loewenherz, C., Fenske, R. A., Simcox, N. J., Bellamy, G., & Kalman, D.
- Venue
- Environmental Health Perspectives
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1997-12
- Volume
- 105
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1344-1353
- ISSN
- 0091-6765 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-9924
- OpenAlex
- W2044566048
- Cited by
- 219
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Biological monitoring of organophosphorus pesticide exposure among children of agricultural workers in central Washington State. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1289/ehp.971051344
- The paper
- Loewenherz, C., Fenske, R. A., Simcox, N. J., Bellamy, G., & Kalman, D. (1997). Biological monitoring of organophosphorus pesticide exposure among children of agricultural workers in central Washington State. Environmental Health Perspectives. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.971051344
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.