The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Reproduction and development.
Open accessAbstract
The currently developed and validated in vitro tests for female and male fertility and also for developmental toxicity are described and evaluated according to their potential use as screening or replacement alternatives to the established in vivo tests in reproductive and developmental toxicology. Alternative methods today can only be used to evaluate a few specific components of the integrated reproductive functions in both females and males. However, in the field of developmental toxicity testing there is a strong theoretical and empirical basis for the predictive power of in vitro screens using mammalian embryos as well as embryonic cells and tissues. Several of these assays have been validated or are currently undergoing validation in several laboratories and are > 80% concordant with in vivo results. Failure to achieve 100% accuracy reflects the inherent limitations of these systems, which are manageable, as the concordance rates are still good. The level of concordance suggests that these assays are adequate for screening purposes to complement traditional in vivo testing. The use of these assays as screens will save valuable in vivo testing resources for those compounds most likely to enter the market and to which people will be exposed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Methods of in vitro toxicology
Eisenbrand, G., Pool-Zobel, B., Baker, V, Balls, M., Blaauboer, B. J., Boobis, A., Carere, A., Kevekordes, S., Lhuguenot, J.-C., Pieters, R., et al. (2002) · Food and Chemical Toxicology · doi:10.1016/s0278-6915(01)00118-1 · Cited by 462
Genschow, E., Spielmann, H., Scholz, G., Seiler, A., Brown, N., Piersma, A., Brady, M., Clemann, N., Huuskonen, H., Paillard, F., et al. (2002) · Alternatives to Laboratory Animals · doi:10.1177/026119290203000204 · Cited by 381
Self-citationEnscore, R. E., Biggerstaff, B. J., Brown, T. L., Fulgham, R. E., Reynolds, P. J., Engelthaler, D. M., Levy, C. E., Parmenter, R. R., Montenieri, J. A., Cheek, J. E., et al. (2002) · The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · doi:10.4269/ajtmh.2002.66.186 · Cited by 166
Li, L., Zhang, X., Wang, L., Chai, Z., Shen, X., Zhang, Z., & Liu, C. (2015) · Journal of Diabetes · doi:10.1111/1753-0407.12251 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Spielmann, H.
- Venue
- Environmental Health Perspectives
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1998-04
- Volume
- 106
- Issue
- suppl 2
- Pages
- 571-576
- ISSN
- 0091-6765 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-9924
- OpenAlex
- W2051395019
- Cited by
- 229
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 22.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reproduction and development. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1289/ehp.98106571
- The paper
- Spielmann, H. (1998). Reproduction and development. Environmental Health Perspectives. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.98106571
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.