Cited by 6Gestational Diabetes Research and ManagementVitamin D Research StudiesNeonatal Health and Biochemistry

Is maternal Vitamin D associated with gestational diabetes mellitus in pregnant women in Cyprus?

Open access
Inancli, I. Soytac, Yayci, E., Atacag, T., Uncu, M.·2016·Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There are conflicting results about the relationship between Vitamin D deficiency (VDD) and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). AIM: The aim of the study was to determine the association between 25 hydroxy vitamin D levels and GDM in Turkish Cypriot pregnant women. STUDY DESIGN: The authors conducted a prospective case-control study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The authors analysed serum 250HD concentrations in 230 pregnant women between 2013-2014 in the winter period (November-April). Twenty- five hydroxy vitamin D was measured at the time of glucose tolerance testing at mid-gestation (24-26 weeks of pregnancy), in a popu- lation at increased risk for GDM. Patients were than divided in to two groups: pregnant women with GDM and pregnant women without GDM. RESULTS: The mean level of 25 hydroxy vitamin D in the study group was 21.9 +10.4 ng/ml. Pregnant women were diagnosed as having vitamin D insufficiency. The level of 25 hydroxy vitamin D in women with and without GDM were 22.3 ± 10.7 ng/dl and 20.3 ± 9.3 ng/dl, respectively (p = 0.262). CONCLUSION: The present study showed 250HD insufficiency in pregnant women at midgestation which was not associated with GDM.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.12891/ceog3152.2016

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In Cyprus, Soytac Inancli et al. performed a study between 2013 and 2014 using 100 g OGTT according to NDDG between 24 and 28 weeks; GDM prevalence was 19.6% among Turkish Cypriot.

    “Soytac Inancli et al. performed a study between 2013 and 2014 using 100 g OGTT, according to the National Diabetes Data Group (NDDG), between 24 and 28 weeks of gestation. The GDM prevalence was 19.6% among Turkish Cypriot [200].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Inancli, I. S., Yayci, E., Atacag, T., & Uncu, M.
Affiliations
Near East University (CY)
Corresponding author
Inancli, I. Soytac
Venue
Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology
Publisher
IMR Press
Published
2016-12-10
Volume
43
Issue
6
Pages
840-843
ISSN
0390-6663 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2901940777
Cited by
6
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Vitamin D Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Neonatal Health and Biochemistry
Keywords
vitamin D deficiency, gestational diabetes mellitus, 25-hydroxyvitamin D, vitamin D insufficiency, pregnancy, second trimester, glucose tolerance test
MeSH terms
Adult, Cyprus, Female, Glucose Tolerance Test, Humans, Pregnancy, Prospective Studies, Risk, Vitamin D, Vitamin D Deficiency, Case-Control Studies, Diabetes, Gestational, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review