Impact of Metabolic Syndrome among Patients with and without Diabetes Mellitus on Long-Term Outcomes after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Open accessAbstract
Metabolic syndrome (MS) is highly prevalent and an established key risk factor for coronary artery disease, regardless of the presence or absence of diabetes mellitus (DM). Long-term follow-up studies have addressed the influence of MS with and without DM on the prognosis of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We classified 748 consecutive patients who had undergone PCI into four groups as follows: neither DM nor MS, DM alone, MS alone, and both DM and MS. Post hoc analyses were conducted using prospectively collected clinical data. Multivariate Cox regression was used to evaluate the risk within each group for all-cause mortality and composite cardiac events (cardiac death, non-fatal acute coronary syndrome), adjusting for age, gender, body mass index, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol level, hypertension, smoking, prior coronary artery bypass graft, presentation of acute coronary syndrome, left ventricular ejection fraction, multivessel disease, and procedural success. The progress of 321 (42.9%) patients with neither DM nor MS, 109 (14.6%) patients with DM alone, 129 (17.2%) patients with MS alone, and 189 (25.3%) patients with both DM and MS was followed up for a mean of 12.0+/-3.6 years. Patients with both DM and MS had significant risk for increased all-cause mortality (2.10 [1.19-3.70]). Patients with MS alone (2.14 [1.31-3.50]) and with both DM and MS (1.87 [1.18-2.96]) were at significant risk for increased cardiac events. In conclusion, the risk of cardiac events is significantly increased in patients with metabolic syndrome following PCI, irrespective of DM.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In CREDO-Kyoto PCI/CABG Registry Cohort-2, patients with mild CKD and an eGFR of 30-60 mL/min/1.73 m2 who took oral statins had a significantly lower incidence rate of major cardiovascular events.
“In CREDO-Kyoto PCI/CABG Registry Cohort-2, a secondary-prevention cohort study on CAD in Japan, patients with mild CKD and an eGFR of 30–60 mL/min/1.73 m2 who took oral statins had a significantly lower incidence rate of major cardiovascular events.”
From Japan Atherosclerosis Society (JAS) guidelines for prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases 2017 (2018) · cites this paper as [775]
Similar effects of statins were not seen in patients with severe CKD whose eGFRs were < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 or in patients undergoing hemodialysis.
“However, similar effects were not seen in patients with severe CKD whose eGFRs were < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 or in patients undergoing hemodialysis.”
From Japan Atherosclerosis Society (JAS) guidelines for prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases 2017 (2018) · cites this paper as [775]
In CREDO-Kyoto, the incidence rate of cerebrovascular disease was also significantly lower in patients who were taking oral statins.
“The incidence rate of cerebrovascular disease was also significantly lower in patients who were taking oral statins775).”
From Japan Atherosclerosis Society (JAS) guidelines for prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases 2017 (2018) · cites this paper as [775]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 22 · Cited by 28
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Isomaa B, Almgren P, Tuomi T, et al: Cardiovascular mor- bidity and mortality associated with the metabolic syn- drome. Diabetes Care 2001; 24: 683-689.
- Alexander CM, Landsman PB, Teutsch SM, Haffner SM: NCEP-defined metabolic syndrome, diabetes, and preva- lence of coronary heart disease among NHANESIII partici- pants age 50 years and older. Diabetes 2003; 52: 1210- 1214.
- Authors
- KASAI, T., MIYAUCHI, K., KURATA, T., OKAZAKI, S., KAJIMOTO, K., KUBOTA, N., & DAIDA, H.
- Affiliations
- Juntendo University (JP)
- Corresponding author
- MIYAUCHI, Katsumi
- ORCID
- Venue
- Hypertension Research
- Publisher
- Japanese Society of Hypertension
- Published
- 2008
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 235-241
- ISSN
- 0916-9636 (ISSN-L)
- 1348-4214
- OpenAlex
- W2062680866
- Cited by
- 28
- References
- 22
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 4.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Hypertension Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
- Keywords
- metabolic syndrome, diabetes mellitus, percutaneous coronary intervention, long-term outcomes, all-cause mortality, cardiac events, acute coronary syndrome, coronary artery disease, prognosis
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Coronary Artery Disease, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prognosis, Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary, Body Mass Index, Metabolic Syndrome, Diabetes Complications
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review