The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Morphology and Morphometry of Skulls of Raccoon Dogs, Nyctereutes procyonoides and Badgers, Meles meles
Open accessAbstract
In order to obtain the basic data to identify the skeletal remains from the archaeological sites, morphological and morphometrical studies were carried out on skulls of living raccoon dogs (35 males and 45 females) and badgers (16 males and 8 females) from Kagoshima Prefecture. Macroscopically, the sexual differences were observed in badgers for the parts of the zygomatic process of the temporal bone and the occipital squama, but were not in raccoon dogs. Among 24 cranial measurements, significant sexual differences were found in five measurement items in raccoon dogs, while 12 items in badgers. Mandibles showed significant sexual differences in both species. Raccoon dogs had significantly larger values than badgers in most of the items concerning length of cranium and most mandibular measurements. The discrimination efficiencies of discriminant formulae between both sexes were lower in raccoon dogs, but higher in badgers, and the efficiencies between both species were obtained 100%. In the regression formulae for estimating skull length, some formulae showed high coefficients of determination in both species. These observations represented interspecific and sexual differences in the skulls of raccoon dogs and badgers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Jurgelenas et al. (2007) and Frackowiak et al. (2013) found similar patterns in their comparison of the skulls of the red fox, raccoon dog, and arctic fox.
“Jurgelenas et al. (2007) and Frackowiak et al . (2013) found similar patterns in their comparison of the skulls of the red fox, raccoon dog ( Nyctereutes procyonoides ; Hidaka et al. 1998) and arctic fox.”
From Comparative Craniometric Measurements of Two Sympatric Species of Vulpes in Ikh Nart Nature Reserve, Mongolia (2018) · cites this paper as Hidaka et al., 1998
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- 2. Driesch, A. 1976. A guide to the measurement of animal bones from archaeological sites. pp. 42-45, pp. 60-61. Peabody Museum Bull. 1. Cambridge. Massachusetts.
- 3. Gittleman, J. L. and Van Valkenburgh, B. 1997. Sexual dimorphism in the canines and skulls of carnivores: effects of size, phylogeny, and behavioural ecology. J. Zool. Lond. 242: 97-117. · DOI
- 7. Lynch, J. M., Whelan, R., Il Fituri, A. I. and Hayden, T. J. 1997. Craniometric variation in the Eurasian badger, Meles meles. J. Zool. Lond. 242: 31-44. · DOI
- 10. Obara, H. 1972. Tanuki. Shizen 25(6): 82-89 (in Japanese).
- 11. Obara, H. 1972. Itachi to Ten. Shizen 25(9): 66-74 (in Japanese).
- 12. Okano, T. 1974. Anatomical studies of the Nyctereutes procyonoides viverrinus Temminck. 2. Comparative anatomy on the mandibles in the Nyctereutes procyonoides viverrinus Temminck and some other kinds of mammals. Jpn. J. Oral Biol. 16: 383-389 (in Japanese). · DOI
- 13. Shigehara, N. and Setoguchi, T. 1986. Carnivora. pp. 166-171. In: Comparative Odontology - Morphology, Function and Evolution of Tooth in Vertebrates. (Goto, M. and Ohtaishi, N. eds.), Ishiyaku Publishers, Inc., Tokyo (in Japanese).
- 15. Wiig, O. 1986. Sexual dimorphism in the skull of minks Mustela vison, badgers Meles meles and otters Lutra lutra. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 87: 163-179. · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
(2018) · Mongolian Journal of Biological Sciences · doi:10.22353/mjbs.2018.16.03 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- HIDAKA, S., MATSUMOTO, M., HIJI, H., OHSAKO, S., & NISHINAKAGAWA, H.
- Affiliations
- Kagoshima University (JP)
- Tagawa Health Center, Fukuoka Prefecture
- Venue
- Journal of Veterinary Medical Science
- Published
- 1998
- Volume
- 60
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 161-167
- ISSN
- 0916-7250 (ISSN-L)
- 1347-7439
- OpenAlex
- W2062196086
- Cited by
- 43
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-nd
- Locations
- Journal of Veterinary Medical Science (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology (arts and humanities) › Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Anatomy › Comparative Animal Anatomy Studies
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Morphological variations and asymmetry
- Keywords
- Nyctereutes procyonoides, badgers, Meles meles, skull morphology, craniometry, sexual dimorphism, mandible, species identification, skeletal remains, Kagoshima Prefecture
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Carnivora, Cephalometry, Female, Japan, Male, Mandible, Sex Characteristics, Skull, Species Specificity, Temporal Bone, Zygoma
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review