Cited by 122Primary Care and Health OutcomesHealthcare Quality and SatisfactionHealthcare Systems and Practices

Experiencing Difficulties Accessing First-Contact Health Services in Canada

Open access
Sanmartin, Claudia, Ross, Nancy·2006·Healthcare Policy | Politiques de Santé

Abstract

In this study, we identify the significant factors associated with having difficulties accessing first-contact healthcare services. Population-based data from two national health surveys, the Health Services Access Survey and the Canadian Community Health Survey, were used to identify respondents who required first-contact services for themselves or for a family member during 2003. Fifteen percent of Canadians reported difficulty accessing routine care, and 23% reported difficulties with immediate care. Physician/service availability was the chief reason cited for difficulties accessing routine care, while for urgent care, it was long wait times. Women, younger respondents and residents of eastern Canada and Quebec were consistently more likely to report difficulties accessing both types of these first-contact services, whereas less educated Canadians were less likely to report problems. Canadians without a regular family doctor were more than twice as likely to report difficulties accessing routine care compared to those who had a regular doctor. New immigrants were almost two and a half times more likely to report difficulties accessing immediate care than were Canadian-born respondents. Household income was not associated with difficulties accessing either type of care. The relatively low level of reporting of difficulties by older and less educated Canadians may be related, in part, to more modest expectations about the healthcare system.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.12927/hcpol.2006.17882

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Patients without a regular primary care provider often experience access barriers, lower continuity of care, less comprehensive care, a lack of care coordination, more unmet needs, and often rely on walk-in clinics and emergency departments.

    “Conversely, patients without a regular primary care provider often experience access barriers, lower continuity of care, less comprehensive care, a lack of care coordination, more unmet needs, and often rely on walk-in clinics and emergency departments, where care can be suboptimal, particularly for patients with complex needs [2, 7, 18–21].”

    From Improved access to and continuity of primary care after attachment to a family physician: longitudinal cohort study on centralized waiting lists for unattached patients in Quebec, Canada (2022) · cites this paper as [18]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Patients without a regular provider often avoid health care, have unmet needs, face difficulties accessing preventive care, and accumulate health problems.

    “Patients without a regular provider often avoid health care, have unmet needs, face difficulties accessing preventive care, and accumulate health problems [2, 7, 18–20, 73].”

    From Improved access to and continuity of primary care after attachment to a family physician: longitudinal cohort study on centralized waiting lists for unattached patients in Quebec, Canada (2022) · cites this paper as [18]

    The Abstract and discussion (page not available in our copy) report that people without a regular family doctor were more than twice as likely to have difficulty accessing routine care; the discussion also links having a regular doctor with better access to preventive care. The introduction says people who have difficulty accessing care may delay treatment and face complications, but it does not establish that patients without a regular provider often avoid care, have unmet needs, or accumulate health problems. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 39 · Cited by 122

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. Aday, L.A. and R. Andersen. 1974. "A Framework for the Study of Access to Medical Care." Health Services Research 9(3): 208-220.
  2. Aday, L.A. and R. Andersen. 1981. "Equity of Access to Medical Care: A Conceptual and Empirical Overview." Medical Care 19(12): 4-27.
  3. Ali, J.S., S. McDermott and R.G. Gravel. 2004. "Recent Research on Immigrant Health from Statistics Canada' s Population Surveys." Canadian Journal of Public Health 95(3): I9-I13.
  4. Beland, Y. 2002. "Canadian Community Health Survey -Methodological Overview." Health Reports 13(3): 9-14.
  5. Blendon, R.J., C. Schoen, C.M. DesRoches et al. 2002. "Inequities in Health Care: A Five- Country Survey." Health Affairs 21: 182-191. [118] HEALTHCARE POLICY Vol.1 No.2, 2006
  6. DeVoe, J.E., G.E. Fryer, R. Phillips and L. Green. 2003. "Receipt of Preventive Care among Adults: Insurance Status and Usual Source of Care." American Journal of Public Health 92: 786- 791.
  7. Finkelstein, M.M. 2001. "Do Factors Other Than Need Determine Utilization of Physicians' Services in Ontario?" Canadian Medical Association Journal 165: 565-570.
  8. Glazier, R.H., E.M. Badley, J.E. Gilbert and L. Rothman. 2000. "The Nature of Increased Hospital Use in Poor Neighbourhoods: Findings from a Canadian Inner City." Canadian Journal of Public Health 91: 268-273.
  9. Grumbach, K., D. Keane and A. Bindman. 1993. "Primary Care and Public Emergency Department Overcrowding." American Journal of Public Health 83(3): 372-378.
  10. Lambrew, J.M., G.H. DeFriese, T.S. Carey, T.C. Ricketts and A.K. Biddle. 1996. "The Effects of Having a Regular Doctor on Access to Primary Care." Medical Care 34(2): 138-151.
  11. Love, M.M. and A.G. Mainous 3rd. 1999. "Commitment to a Regular Physician: How Long Will Patients Wait to See Their Own Physician for Acute Illness?" Journal of Family Practice 48: 202-207.
  12. Mustard, C.A., P. Kaufert, A. Kozyrskyj and T. Mayer. 1998. "Sex Differences in the Use of Health Care Services." New England Journal of Medicine 338: 1678-1683.
  13. Newbold, B. 2005. "Health Status and Health Care of Immigrants in Canada: A Longitudinal Analysis." Journal of Health Services Research and Policy 10(2): 77-83.
  14. Newsome, P.R. and G.H. Wright. 1999. "A Review of Patient Satisfaction: 1. Concepts of Satisfaction." British Dental Journal 186: 161-165.
  15. Pereira, A.G. and S.D. Pearson. 2003. "Patient Attitudes toward Continuity of Care." Archives of Internal Medicine 163: 909-912.
  16. Roos, N., C. Burchill and K. Carriere. 2003. "Who Are the High Hospital Users? A Canadian Case Study." Journal of Health Services Research and Policy 8(1): 5-10.
  17. Roos, N.P. and C.A. Mustard. 1997. "Variation in Health and Healthcare Use by Socioeconomic Status in Winnipeg, Canada: Does the System Work Well? Yes and No." Milbank Quarterly 75(1): 89-111.
  18. Sanmartin, C., C. Houle, S. Tremblay and J.J. Berthelot. 2002. "Changes in Unmet Health Care Needs." Health Reports 13(3): 15-21.
  19. Sitzia, J. and N. Wood. 1997. "Patient Satisfaction: A Review of Issues and Concepts." Social Science and Medicine 45: 1829-1843. Statistics Canada and Canadian Institute for Health Information. 2005. Health Indicators 2004. Ottawa: Authors.
  20. Steele, L.S., L. Lemieux-Charles, J.P. Clark and R.H. Glazier. 2002. "The Impact of Policy Changes on the Health of Recent Immigrants and Refugees in the Inner City. A Qualitative Study of Service Providers' Perspectives." Canadian Journal of Public Health 92: 118-122.
  21. Thompson, A.G. and R. Sunol. 1995. "Expectations as Determinants of Patient Satisfaction: Concepts, Theory and Evidence." International Journal of Qualitative Health Care 7: 127-141.
  22. Wu, Z., M.J. Penning and C.M. Schimmele. 2005. "Immigrant Status and Unmet Health Care Needs." Canadian Journal of Public Health 96(5): 369-373.

Authors
Sanmartin, C., & Ross, N.
Affiliations
Statistics Canada (CA)
Venue
Healthcare Policy | Politiques de Santé
Published
2006-01-15
Volume
1
Issue
2
Pages
103-119
ISSN
  • 1715-6572 (ISSN-L)
  • 1715-6580
OpenAlex
W300791146
Cited by
122
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 10
FWCI
3.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Healthcare policy (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Primary Care and Health Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare Quality and Satisfaction
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare Systems and Practices
Keywords
health care access, first contact care, usual care, urgent care, waiting time, physician availability, new immigrants, educational attainment, gender differences, age differences, regional variation, Canada

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review