Cited by 66Emergency and Acute Care StudiesHealth Services Management and PolicyHealthcare Systems and Practices

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Alternative Level of Care: Canada's Hospital Beds, the Evidence and Options

Open access
Sutherland, Jason, Crump, R.·2013·Healthcare Policy | Politiques de Santé

Abstract

Patients designated as alternative level of care (ALC) are an ongoing concern for healthcare policy makers across Canada.These patients occupy valuable hospital beds and limit access to acute care services.The objective of this paper is to present policy alternatives to address underlying factors associated with ALC bed use.Three alternatives, and their respective limitations and structural challenges, are discussed.Potential solutions may require a mix of policy options proposed here.Inadequate policy jeopardizes new acute care activity-based funding schemes in British Columbia and Ontario.Failure to address this issue could exacerbate pressures on the existing bottlenecks in the community care system in these and other provinces. RésuméLes patients qui attendent un autre niveau de soins (ANS) constituent une préoccupation constante pour les responsables des politiques de santé partout au Canada.Ces patients occupent de précieux lits d'hôpital et limitent l' accès aux soins de courte durée.L' objectif de

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.12927/hcpol.2013.23480

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In Canada, provincial governments provide block funding to hospitals for acute care based on historical budgets, inflation, and political factors, rather than actual patient numbers or resource demands.

    “In Canada, provincial governments provide block funding to hospitals for acute care based on historical budgets, inflation, and political factors, rather than actual patient numbers or resource demands (Sutherland and Crump 2013).”

    From Estimating the Cost of Alternate Level of Care When It Is Inextricably Linked to the Cost of Acute Care: A Canadian Example (2026) · cites this paper as Sutherland and Crump 2013

    The Financial Incentives Option section says Canadian hospitals have historically received global budgets: single payments independent of the volume or type of care provided. It does not say those budgets are determined by historical spending, inflation, or political factors. The paper also notes that British Columbia and Ontario had begun moving toward activity-based funding, so the claim does not describe every province without qualification. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The study findings reinforce that ALC patients have negative health outcomes, with an incremental effect with length of stay.

    “Our findings reinforce the negative health outcomes detrimental to the individual ALC patient, with an incremental effect with length of stay [32].”

    From Healthcare-Associated Adverse Events in Alternate Level of Care Patients Awaiting Long-Term Care in Hospital (2022) · cites this paper as [32]

    The “Hospital Bed Use: The Case of Alternative Level of Care” section says that waiting in hospital prolongs exposure to adverse events and that delayed discharge can lead to health deterioration, particularly for frail geriatric patients. It does not establish an incremental increase in negative health outcomes with each increase in length of stay. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • ALC status is an indication of system failure in care quality and equity, placing vulnerable older adults at further risk of functional decline, delirium, falls, and infections, while incurring disproportionate healthcare costs.

    “We therefore argue that ALC status is an indication of system failure in care quality and equity, placing vulnerable older adults at further risk of functional decline delirium, falls, and infections, while incurring disproportionate healthcare costs [3,31,32].”

    From Healthcare-Associated Adverse Events in Alternate Level of Care Patients Awaiting Long-Term Care in Hospital (2022) · cites this paper as [32]

    In “Hospital Bed Use: The Case of Alternative Level of Care” (page not provided), the paper says discharge delays can cause rapid health deterioration in frail geriatric patients and prolong exposure to avoidable adverse events. The Abstract and Discussion (pages not provided) describe inefficient use of costly hospital resources. The paper does not identify delirium, falls, or infections as specific risks, or establish disproportionate healthcare costs; the citing authors present the care-quality-and-equity judgment as their own argument. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Delayed discharge is a prevalent issue across hospitals in many countries including Canada, the United States, and England.

    “Delayed discharge is a prevalent issue across hospitals in many countries including Canada [3], the United States [2, 4], and England [5].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Baker, G.R., P.G. Norton, V. Flintoft, R. Blais, A. Brown, J. Cox et al. 2004. "The Canadian Adverse Events Study: The Incidence of Adverse Events among Hospital Patients in Canada." Canadian Medical Association Journal 170(11): 1678-86.
  2. Ham, C., J. Dixon and C. Chantler. 2011 (March). "Clinically Integrated Systems: The Future of NHS Reform in England?" British Medical Journal 342(March): d905.
  3. Hurley, J. 2004. "Regionalization and the Allocation of Healthcare Resources to Meet Population Health Needs." HealthcarePapers 5(1): 34-39.
  4. Leatt, P., G. Pink and M. Guerriere. 2000. "Towards a Canadian Model of Integrated Healthcare." HealthcarePapers 1(20): 13-35.
  5. McGrail, K., M. Law and P.C.C. Hébert. 2010. "No More Dithering on e-Health: Let' s Keep Patients Safe Instead." Canadian Medical Association Journal 182(6): 535.
  6. Meret-Hanke, L.A. 2011. "Effects of the Program of All-inclusive Care for the Elderly on Hospital Use." Gerontologist 51(6): 774-85.
  7. O'Reilly, J., R. Busse, U. Hakkinen, Z. Or, A. Street and M. Wiley. 2012. "Paying for Hospital Care: The Experience with Implementing Activity-Based Funding in Five European Countries." Health Economics, Policy and Law 7: 73-101.
  8. Robertson, M.J., R.W. Broyles and A. Khaliq. 2004. "The Influence of Financial Incentives and Racial Status on the Use of Post-Hospital Care." Journal of Aging and Social Policy 16(4): 17-38.
  9. Simpson, S.H. 2011. "Of Silos and Systems: The Issue of Regionalizing Health Care." Canadian Journal of Hospital Pharmacy 64(4): 237-40.
  10. HEALTHCARE POLICY Vol.9 No.1, 2013
  11. Vedel, I., M. Monette, F.F. Béland, J. Monette and H. Bergman. 2011 (March). "Ten Years of Integrated Care: Backwards and Forwards. The Case of the Province of Québec, Canada." International Journal of Integrated Care 11(Spec. Ed.): e004.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Sutherland, J., & Crump, R.
Affiliations
University of British Columbia (CA)
Venue
Healthcare Policy | Politiques de Santé
Published
2013-08-19
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
26-34
ISSN
  • 1715-6572 (ISSN-L)
  • 1715-6580
OpenAlex
W2132098069
Cited by
66
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1
FWCI
1.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Healthcare policy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Michael Smith Health Research BC
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Emergency and Acute Care Studies
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Services Management and Policy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Healthcare Systems and Practices
Keywords
hospital bed utilization, activity-based funding, community care system, British Columbia, Ontario, long-term care
MeSH terms
Canada, Health Services Accessibility, Hospitals, Humans, Patient Discharge, Reimbursement, Incentive, Residential Facilities, Delivery of Health Care, Integrated, Capacity Building

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review