Cited by 11Pharmaceutical industry and healthcareHealthcare RegulationOccupational and Professional Licensing Regulation

Ensuring Accountability through Health Professional Regulatory Bodies: The Case of Conflict of Interest

Open access
Zelisko, Debra, Baumann, Andrea, Gamble, Brenda, Laporte, Audrey, Deber, Raisa·2014·Healthcare Policy | Politiques de Santé

Abstract

How do self-regulated health professions' regulatory bodies address financial conflict of interest (coi) and ensure accountability to the public? using document analysis, we examined how four ontario regulatory colleges (physicians, nurses, physiotherapists, audiologists/speech-language pathologists) defined coi and the education, guidance and enforcement they provided for coi-related issues. These colleges are upholding the mandates to define, identify and address financial coi by providing regulations or standards and guidelines to their membership; they differed in the amount of educational materials provided to their registrants and in the possible coi scenarios they presented. Although there were few disciplinary hearings pertaining to financial coi, findings for the hearings that did occur were documented and posted on the college public registers (the listing of all registered college members along with all relevant practice information), informing the public of any limitations or restrictions placed on a member as a result of the hearing.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.12927/hcpol.2014.23850

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Another source compared nursing regulation with other regulated professionals.

    “and another compared nursing regulation with other regulated professionals [144].”

    From Nursing regulation in Canada: Insights from a scoping review (2025) · cites this paper as [144]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zelisko, D., Baumann, A., Gamble, B., Laporte, A., & Deber, R.
Affiliations
  • McMaster University (CA)
  • Ontario Tech University (CA)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
Venue
Healthcare Policy | Politiques de Santé
Published
2014-09-30
Volume
10
Issue
SP
Pages
110-120
ISSN
  • 1715-6572 (ISSN-L)
  • 1715-6580
OpenAlex
W2154018411
Cited by
11
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
1.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Healthcare policy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (101967_1)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Healthcare Regulation
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Occupational and Professional Licensing Regulation
Keywords
financial conflicts of interest, accountability, self-regulation, professional colleges, disciplinary hearings, professional registration, physician regulation, nursing regulation, physiotherapy regulation, Ontario
MeSH terms
Health Occupations, Humans, Ontario, Social Responsibility, Societies, Organizational Policy, Conflict of Interest, Professional Misconduct

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review