Ensuring Accountability through Health Professional Regulatory Bodies: The Case of Conflict of Interest
Open accessAbstract
How do self-regulated health professions' regulatory bodies address financial conflict of interest (coi) and ensure accountability to the public? using document analysis, we examined how four ontario regulatory colleges (physicians, nurses, physiotherapists, audiologists/speech-language pathologists) defined coi and the education, guidance and enforcement they provided for coi-related issues. These colleges are upholding the mandates to define, identify and address financial coi by providing regulations or standards and guidelines to their membership; they differed in the amount of educational materials provided to their registrants and in the possible coi scenarios they presented. Although there were few disciplinary hearings pertaining to financial coi, findings for the hearings that did occur were documented and posted on the college public registers (the listing of all registered college members along with all relevant practice information), informing the public of any limitations or restrictions placed on a member as a result of the hearing.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Another source compared nursing regulation with other regulated professionals.
“and another compared nursing regulation with other regulated professionals [144].”
From Nursing regulation in Canada: Insights from a scoping review (2025) · cites this paper as [144]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Nursing regulation in Canada: Insights from a scoping review
Chiu, P., Thiessen, N. J., Idrees, S., Leslie, K., & Kung, J. Y. (2025) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0323716 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
“%) compared the content of regulatory standards, policies, and guidelines across nursing and interprofessional contexts and jurisdictions in Canada [138,140,141,144,161,175,188].”
Influential
- Authors
- Zelisko, D., Baumann, A., Gamble, B., Laporte, A., & Deber, R.
- Affiliations
- McMaster University (CA)
- Ontario Tech University (CA)
- University of Toronto (CA)
- Venue
- Healthcare Policy | Politiques de Santé
- Publisher
- Longwoods Publishing
- Published
- 2014-09-30
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- SP
- Pages
- 110-120
- ISSN
- 1715-6572 (ISSN-L)
- 1715-6580
- PMC
- PMC4255581
- OpenAlex
- W2154018411
- Cited by
- 11
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 1.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Healthcare policy (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research (101967_1)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Healthcare Regulation
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Occupational and Professional Licensing Regulation
- Keywords
- financial conflicts of interest, accountability, self-regulation, professional colleges, disciplinary hearings, professional registration, physician regulation, nursing regulation, physiotherapy regulation, Ontario
- MeSH terms
- Health Occupations, Humans, Ontario, Social Responsibility, Societies, Organizational Policy, Conflict of Interest, Professional Misconduct
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review