The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Book Review
Abstract
The language of quality is getting rather dog-eared: all those assurances and all those apologies. Now, the Government are making the most of clinical mistakes in order to bring doctors to heel: perhaps not a very wise policy in the long term. Whatever the motives, the long-suffering public would like to have their faith in the NHS restored.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Barry Issenberg, S., Mcgaghie, W. C., Petrusa, E. R., Lee Gordon, D., & Scalese, R. J. (2005) · Medical Teacher · doi:10.1080/01421590500046924 · Cited by 3,966
A survey of mobile cloud computing: architecture, applications, and approaches
Dinh, H. T., Lee, C., Niyato, D., & Wang, P. (2013) · Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing · doi:10.1002/wcm.1203 · Cited by 2,391
Role of Computerized Physician Order Entry Systems in Facilitating Medication Errors
Koppel, R. (2005) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.293.10.1197 · Cited by 2,126
Ash, J. S. (2003) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1197/jamia.m1471 · Cited by 1,789
Privacy in the age of medical big data
Price, W. N., & Cohen, I. G. (2019) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-018-0272-7 · Cited by 1,522
Metadata
- Authors
- Wall, A.
- Venue
- British Journal of Healthcare Management
- Publisher
- Mark Allen Group
- Published
- 2000-09
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 413-413
- ISSN
- 1358-0574 (ISSN-L)
- 1759-7382
- OpenAlex
- W2324093677
- Cited by
- 5,903
- References
- 0
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Book Review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.12968/bjhc.2000.6.9.19311
- The paper
- Wall, A. (2000). Book Review. British Journal of Healthcare Management. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjhc.2000.6.9.19311
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
