The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Pilot study to show the loss of important data in nursing handover
Abstract
A good nursing handover process is a crucial part of providing quality nursing care in a modern healthcare environment. The conservation of patient data during the handover process is vital to ensure good continuity of care and safe practice. Any errors or omissions made during the handover process may have dangerous consequences. The authors observed the handover of 12 simulated patients over five consecutive handover cycles between nurses. Three handover styles were used and the amount of data loss was recorded for each style. A purely verbal handover style resulted in the loss of all data after three cycles. A note-taking style (the traditional style used in most hospital wards) resulted in only 31% of data being transferred correctly after five cycles. When a typed sheet was included with the verbal handover, data loss was minimal. Current handover methods may result in significant loss of important data that may impact on patient care. The authors recommend that prior to handover, a formal handover sheet be constructed that can be transferred as part of the handover process.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
CATCHPOLE, K. R., DE LEVAL, M. R., MCEWAN, A., PIGOTT, N., ELLIOTT, M. J., MCQUILLAN, A., MACDONALD, C., & GOLDMAN, A. J. (2007) · Pediatric Anesthesia · doi:10.1111/j.1460-9592.2006.02239.x · Cited by 516
Can We Make Postoperative Patient Handovers Safer? A Systematic Review of the Literature
Segall, N., Bonifacio, A. S., Schroeder, R. A., Barbeito, A., Rogers, D., Thornlow, D. K., Emery, J., Kellum, S., Wright, M. C., & Mark, J. B. (2012) · Anesthesia & Analgesia · doi:10.1213/ane.0b013e318253af4b · Cited by 250
Flemming, D., & Hübner, U. (2013) · International Journal of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2013.03.004 · Cited by 102
Staggers, N., Clark, L., Blaz, J. W., & Kapsandoy, S. (2011) · Health Informatics Journal · doi:10.1177/1460458211405809 · Cited by 76
Metadata
- Authors
- Pothier, D., Monteiro, P., Mooktiar, M., & Shaw, A.
- Venue
- British Journal of Nursing
- Publisher
- Mark Allen Group
- Published
- 2005-11-01
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 20
- Pages
- 1090-1093
- ISSN
- 0966-0461 (ISSN-L)
- 2052-2819
- OpenAlex
- W2132195419
- Cited by
- 170
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pilot study to show the loss of important data in nursing handover. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.12968/bjon.2005.14.20.20053
- The paper
- Pothier, D., Monteiro, P., Mooktiar, M., & Shaw, A. (2005). Pilot study to show the loss of important data in nursing handover. British Journal of Nursing. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2005.14.20.20053
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.