The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Undertaking a literature review: a step-by-step approach
Open accessAbstract
Nowadays, most nurses, pre- and post-qualification, will be required to undertake a literature review at some point, either as part of a course of study, as a key step in the research process, or as part of clinical practice development or policy. For student nurses and novice researchers it is often seen as a difficult undertaking. It demands a complex range of skills, such as learning how to define topics for exploration, acquiring skills of literature searching and retrieval, developing the ability to analyse and synthesize data as well as becoming adept at writing and reporting, often within a limited time scale. The purpose of this article is to present a step-by-step guide to facilitate understanding by presenting the critical elements of the literature review process. While reference is made to different types of literature reviews, the focus is on the traditional or narrative review that is undertaken, usually either as an academic assignment or part of the research process
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 21
- 2007, AND', `OR' and `NOT' (Ely and Scott
- Beecroft C, 2006, The Research Process in Nursing
- 10.1016/S0001-2092(06)62653-7 · DOI · Paper page
- Burns N, 2007, Understanding Nursing Research - Building an Evidence-Based Practice
- 10.1054/nepr.2001.0008 · DOI
- Cohen G, 1990, The Open University's Introduction to Psychology.Volume 2. Milton Keynes
- Colling J, 2003, Urol Nurs, 23, 297
- 10.12968/bjon.2007.16.11.23681 · DOI · Paper page
- Ely C, 2007, Essential Study Skills for Nursing
- Hart C, 1998, Doing a Literature Review
- 10.7748/nr2000.04.7.3.40.c6120 · DOI
- Hek G, 2006, Making Sense of Research: An Introduction for Health and Social Care Practitioners
- 10.7748/ns.12.44.46.s56 · doi:10.7748/ns.12.44.46.s56
- Newell R, 2006, Research for Evidence-Based Practice
- 10.12968/pnur.2002.13.1.9222 · doi:10.12968/pnur.2002.13.1.9222
- Parahoo K, 2006, Nursing Research - principles, process and issues
- 10.1177/014572170403000106 · DOI
- Polit DF, 2004, Nursing Research: principles and methods
- Polit D, 2006, Essentials of Nursing Research: Methods, Appraisal and Utilization
- 10.7748/ns2005.11.20.11.41.c4010 · doi:10.7748/ns2005.11.20.11.41.c4010
- 10.7748/ns2004.10.19.6.45.c3728 · doi:10.7748/ns2004.10.19.6.45.c3728
Cited by
Making sense of implementation theories, models and frameworks
Nilsen, P. (2015) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-015-0242-0 · Cited by 4,447
Guidance on Conducting a Systematic Literature Review
Xiao, Y., & Watson, M. (2019) · Journal of Planning Education and Research · doi:10.1177/0739456x17723971 · Cited by 3,467
Past, present and future of Industry 4.0—A systematic literature review and research agenda proposal
Liao, Y., Deschamps, F., Loures, E. D. F. R., & Ramos, L. F. P. (2017) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2017.1308576 · Cited by 2,036
Writing narrative style literature reviews
Ferrari, R. (2015) · Medical Writing · doi:10.1179/2047480615z.000000000329 · Cited by 1,907
Synthesizing information systems knowledge: A typology of literature reviews
Paré, G., Trudel, M.-C., Jaana, M., & Kitsiou, S. (2015) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2014.08.008 · Cited by 1,987
Metadata
- Authors
- Cronin, P., Ryan, F., & Coughlan, M.
- Venue
- British Journal of Nursing
- Publisher
- Mark Allen Group
- Published
- 2008-01-01
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 38-43
- ISSN
- 0966-0461 (ISSN-L)
- 2052-2819
- OpenAlex
- W2134444348
- Cited by
- 1,426
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Undertaking a literature review: a step-by-step approach. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.12968/bjon.2008.17.1.28059
- The paper
- Cronin, P., Ryan, F., & Coughlan, M. (2008). Undertaking a literature review: a step-by-step approach. British Journal of Nursing. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2008.17.1.28059
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.