Cited by 11Celiac Disease Research and ManagementDietetics, Nutrition, and EducationEosinophilic Esophagitis

The role of nurses and dietitians in managing paediatric coeliac disease

Fok, Chi-Yee, Sara Holland, Kate, Gil-Zaragozano, Elena, Prosad Paul, Siba·2016·British Journal of Nursing

Abstract

Coeliac disease (CD) is an immune-mediated genetic condition elicited by the ingestion of gluten, leading to proximal small bowel enteropathy. It affects around 1% of the population, although only a small proportion of cases are actually diagnosed. It is a multisystem disorder presenting with both gastrointestinal and extra-intestinal manifestations such as diarrhoea, abdominal pain, constipation, vomiting, iron deficiency anaemia, faltering growth, dental enamel defects, short stature, liver disease, arthropathy and recurrent aphthous ulcers. Nurses, working in different clinical settings, are best placed for early recognition and diagnosis of CD in children. Suspicion of CD should lead to immunoglobulin A (IgA)-based anti-tissue transglutaminase antibody screening tests and a diagnosis confirmed by an intestinal biopsy. Modification of European (ESPGHAN) guidelines now enables CD to be diagnosed without a small-bowel biopsy in a select group of symptomatic children. A gluten-free diet should preferably be started by paediatric dietitians. Strict adherence to a gluten-free diet is essential to maintain good health and to prevent long-term complications. A case study demonstrating some of the challenges that may be faced in children with CD in clinical practice is described. Specialist nurse-led CD clinics are gaining popularity and have been found to be equally effective in providing continuity of quality care.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.12968/bjon.2016.25.8.449

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fok, C.-Y., Sara Holland, K., Gil-Zaragozano, E., & Prosad Paul, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Bristol (GB)
  • Specialist Paediatric Dietitian, Yeovil District Hospital
  • Bristol Royal Hospital for Children (GB)
  • Consultant Paediatrician, Torbay Hospital, Torquay
Venue
British Journal of Nursing
Published
2016-04-28
Volume
25
Issue
8
Pages
449-455
ISSN
  • 0966-0461 (ISSN-L)
  • 2052-2819
OpenAlex
W2345235326
Cited by
11
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1
FWCI
1.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • British Journal of Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Celiac Disease Research and Management
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Dietetics, Nutrition, and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Eosinophilic Esophagitis
Keywords
celiac disease, pediatric celiac disease, nurses, dietitians, gluten-free diet, diagnosis, anti-tissue transglutaminase antibodies, small bowel biopsy, nurse-led clinics, extraintestinal manifestations, iron deficiency anemia, failure to thrive, ESPGHAN guidelines
MeSH terms
Protein Glutamine gamma Glutamyltransferase 2, Biopsy, Celiac Disease, Child, Child, Preschool, Humans, Intestine, Small, Transglutaminases, Risk Assessment, GTP-Binding Proteins, Professional Role, Nurse's Role, Early Diagnosis, Diet, Gluten-Free, Practice Patterns, Nurses', Early Medical Intervention, Nutritionists

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review