The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year.
Patient engagement and satisfaction with goal planning: Impact on outcome from rehabilitation
Abstract
Aim: To examine the relationship between patient/family engagement in goal planning, satisfaction with the goal setting process and associated goal attainment and functional gains during rehabilitation. Method: A prospective cohort analysis of consecutively completed episodes for patients discharged over a 1-year period (January-December 2013) in a specialist neurological rehabilitation service in the UK. Participants were adults (n=83) with neurological disabilities (mean±SD age: 42.8 ±15.0 years; programme length: 98 ± 47 days; male to female ratio: 69:31; diagnosis: brain injury (n=75, 90%), spinal cord injury (n=5, 6%), other neurological conditions (n=3, 4%)). The measures used were sixpoint visual analogue scales to rate goal engagement and goal satisfaction, Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS) and the UK Functional Assessment Measure (UK FIM+FAM). Results: Significant improvements were seen between admission and discharge for patient goal engagement (Mann-Whitney z=-2.2, p=0.027) and satisfaction (z=-2.2, p=0.031). Significant correlations were seen between goal engagement and goal satisfaction for patients on admission (Spearman’s rho 0.41, p=0.03) and for their families on discharge (rho 0.82, p<0.001). Patients’ goal engagement by discharge was strongly correlated with GAS achieved T-scores (rho 0.54, p<0.001) and with functional gain (change in FIM+FAM-Motor subscale rho 0.46, p<0.001). Conclusions: Active involvement of patients and their families in meaningful goal planning is an important component of rehabilitation that is associated with improved goal attainment and better functional outcomes.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“However, patients undergoing stroke recovery in inpatient rehabilitation centers often stay in these centers for extended periods. These extended stays can lead to a lack of motivation for goal-directed activities, resulting in reduced engagement and limited benefits from rehabilitation [69].”
From A Data Visualization Tool for Patients and Healthcare Providers to Communicate during Inpatient Stroke Rehabilitation (2024) · cites this paper as [69]
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Research works printed but not linked: 18
- 10.3109/02699059309029680 · DOI
- 10.1177/0269215511405230 · DOI
- Danzl MM, 2012, J Allied Health, 41, 35
- 10.1177/0269215506070793 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF01530764 · DOI
- 10.1080/09638280500265961 · DOI
- 10.1177/0269215506070791 · DOI
- 10.1080/02699050802695582 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.03.018 · DOI
- 10.1177/0269215509102980 · DOI
- 10.1080/09602010903529610 · DOI
- 10.3109/09638288.2012.690501 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/0269215508101742 · DOI
- 10.1191/026921599676896799 · DOI
- 10.2340/16501977-0383 · DOI
- 10.1191/026921598678166365 · DOI
- 10.1177/0269215509103551 · DOI
- 10.1097/00002508-198612000-00003 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ramesh, S. H., Ouskine, A., Khorasani, E., Ebrahimipour, M., Finestone, H., Chan, A. D. C., & Rajabiyazdi, F. (2024) · Graphics Interface · doi:10.1145/3670947.3670978 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Turner-Stokes, L., Rose, H., Ashford, S., & Singer, B.
- Affiliations
- Herbert Dunhill Professor of Rehabilitation, Department of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, Cicely Saunders Institute, King's College London, UK and Director, Regional Rehabilitation Unit, Northwick Park Hospital, Harrow, Middlesex, UK
- Northwick Park Hospital (GB)
- King's College London (GB)
- The University of Western Australia (AU)
- Venue
- International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation
- Publisher
- Mark Allen Group
- Published
- 2015-05-02
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 210-216
- ISSN
- 1741-1645 (ISSN-L)
- 1759-779X
- OpenAlex
- W2117521438
- Cited by
- 91
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 13.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation (publishedVersion)
- UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion)
- Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Medical Practices and Rehabilitation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Therapy Practice and Research
- Keywords
- patient engagement, goal planning, goal setting, goal achievement, patient satisfaction, family involvement, neurorehabilitation, brain injury, spinal cord injury, functional outcome, goal attainment scaling
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review