The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Interaction Between Educational Approach and Space: The Case of Montessori
Open accessAbstract
This study aims to emphasize that the realization of effective educational approaches depends on the design of spaces suitable for the determined philosophy, and to reveal the design decisions required by the Montessori educational approach. A three-step method was followed in the line of the aim of this study. The first step is to acquire theoretical knowledge about the Montessori educational approach. The second step is to perform a spatial analysis based on the obtained plan schedules and visual materials from the school samples that have adopted the Montessori educational approach and designed by the designers according to this approach and the final step is to bring design decisions to designers and educators in order to create educational environments for the Montessori educational approach, depending on the literature and school analysis. In the study, it is observed in Montessori educational approach that the relationship between interior and exterior spaces is very important, that the circulation spaces and classrooms are designed as flexible multipurpose spaces depending on the basic principles of freedom, socialization, and that child-scale design and natural light are extremely important for all of the areas in question. It is seen that the Montessori approach is influential on educational spaces and the presence of spaces embodying this approach has a correspondence in architecture. In this context, this study, which reveals the relationship between learning environments and learning efficiency, is considered to be a source of data for the schools to be designed in this direction.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Chosen activities are meaningful, and the child focuses its attention and performs them with an autonomously established increasing precision”
From Active inference goes to school: the importance of active learning in the age of large language models (2024) · cites this paper as [150]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“and that Montessori schools displayed smaller disparity in performance between children from low and high income and from diverse cultural backgrounds [128,150,170,171].”
From Active inference goes to school: the importance of active learning in the age of large language models (2024) · cites this paper as [150]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Chan, T. C. (1988). The aesthetic environment and student learning. School Business Affairs, 54(1), 26–27.
- Goffin, S., & Wilson, C. (2001). Curriculum models and early childhood education appraising the relationships. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
- İslamoğlu, Ö. (2014). A Method Suggestion for Determination of Flexibility Strategy in Schools (PhD Thesis). Trabzon: Karadeniz Technical University, Institute of Science and Technology.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Di Paolo, L. D., White, B., Guénin-Carlut, A., Constant, A., & Clark, A. (2024) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2023.0148 · Cited by 14
“Furniture, objects and materials, all of the correct size and weight such that children can effectively interact with them (e.g. [128,134,140,151,152]), are purposedly organized in the space tailoring interests and developmental trajectory of each child [153–157].”
BackgroundMacià-Gual, A., & Domingo-Peñafiel, L. (2021) · European Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.12973/eu-jer.10.1.175 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- İslamoğlu, Ö.
- Affiliations
- Karadeniz Technical University (TR)
- Corresponding author
- İslamoğlu, Özge
- ORCID
- İslamoğlu, Özge
- Venue
- EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education
- Publisher
- Modestum Publishing Ltd
- Published
- 2017-11-06
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 1305-8215 (ISSN-L)
- 1305-8223
- OpenAlex
- W2767544310
- Cited by
- 12
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 2.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Educational Environments and Student Outcomes
- Social Sciences › Education › Education Methods and Practices
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Architecture › Architecture, Design, and Social History
- Keywords
- school space design, learning environment, daylighting, circulation space, classroom design, learning efficiency
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review