Cited by 37Science Education and PedagogyEducational Methods and OutcomesEducational Strategies and Epistemologies

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Exploring Indigenous Game-based Physics Activities in Pre-Service Physics Teachers' Conceptual Change and Transformation of Epistemic Beliefs

Open access
Morales, Marie Paz Escaño·2016·EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education

Abstract

Background:Laro-ng-Lahi (Indigenous Filipino games) based physics activities fortified the integration of culture in the pre-service physics education to develop students’ epistemic beliefs and the notion of conceptual understanding through conceptual change.Material and methods:The study conveniently involved 28 pre-service undergraduate physics students enrolled in an introductory physics course in the Philippine University. Context-culture-based framework dictated how the traditional Filipino games blend with Newtonian concept formation to motivate conditions and conceptual ecology for conceptual change to occur. These physics activities conducted by the participants in each session directed their explicit learning of Mechanics concepts. Pre-post-test design using the Force Concept Inventory and Epistemological Beliefs Assessment for Physical Science detected the participants’ conceptual change epistemic beliefs improvement. Qualitative data from student interviews and journal insights supplemented the quantitative data.Results:Results showed that these physics activities indicated significant change in the students’ conception interpreted as conceptual change. The study also indicated incremental development of epistemic beliefs, however, the progress observed was not statistically significant.Conclusions:Consequently, it is recommended that sustained and prolonged exposure of pre-service undergraduate physics students to culture-influenced instructional designs may lead to eventually developing sophisticated epistemic belief systems consequently providing better teaching and learning framework and service for quality education.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.12973/eurasia.2017.00676a

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Morales, M. P. E.
Affiliations
Philippine Normal University (PH)
Corresponding author
Morales, Marie Paz Escaño
Venue
EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education
Published
2016-12-27
Volume
13
Issue
5
ISSN
  • 1305-8215 (ISSN-L)
  • 1305-8223
OpenAlex
W2573660989
Cited by
37
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1
FWCI
5.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Methods and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
Keywords
game-based learning, pre-service physics teachers, conceptual change, epistemological beliefs, mechanics concepts, Force Concept Inventory, classical mechanics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review