The DOI matches its Crossref record.
E-Assessment Data Compatibility Resolution Methodology with Bidirectional Data Transformation
Open accessAbstract
Electronic Assessment (E-Assessment) also known as computer aided assessment for the purposes involving diagnostic, formative or summative examining using data analysis. Digital assessments come commonly from social, academic, and adaptive learning in machine readable forms to deliver the machine scoring function. To achieve real-time and smart e-assessment, data modeling needs dramatic improvements at the level of representation which will improve examinees to gain prompt response instantly after attempting exams. Whereas, computer based inference to gain intelligence in assessing results through computations is becoming a useful feature in todays’ testing systems. Induction of rule base linked data is desired to be reformed from the old tradition data model found either in spread sheet or relational database used for data storage. These data forms are essential to be converted into semantical annotated form to support Artificial Intelligence. This can be done with the use of Semantic Web data model Resource Description Framework (RDF) built-up using hierarchal and linked data representation. Updating assessment source data later for results is one of the hardest problem of all viabilities in traditional and semantically augmented systems when combined for evaluating. This study purposes a methodology of bidirectional data transformation back and forth from Relational Database (RDB) and RDF. A case study representing qualitative analysis of transforming student’s results information into RDF store reforming data as ready to be analyzed. At the end of this study outcomes show how data updating becomes feasible by following proposed data transformation procedure.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“It constructed a human-computer interaction and widely used to generate real-time and intelligent feedback according to learners' input, which has been regarded as a reliable feature in modern assessment system [32].”
From A Review of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Education from 2010 to 2020 (2021) · cites this paper as [32]
In the citing paper
“Two studies on deep learning were first mentioned in the selected papers in 2017 [23,32].”
From A Review of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Education from 2010 to 2020 (2021) · cites this paper as [32]
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Review of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Education from 2010 to 2020
Zhai, X., Chu, X., Chai, C. S., Jong, M. S. Y., Istenic, A., Spector, M., Liu, J.-B., Yuan, J., & Li, Y. (2021) · Complexity · doi:10.1155/2021/8812542 · Cited by 1,364
“Two studies on deep learning were first mentioned in the selected papers in 2017 [23, 32].”
BackgroundMethod
Metadata
- Authors
- Malik, K. R., & Ahmad, T.
- Affiliations
- COMSATS University Islamabad (PK)
- University of Engineering and Technology Lahore (PK)
- Corresponding author
- Malik, Kaleem Razzaq
- ORCID
- Malik, Kaleem Razzaq
- Venue
- EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education
- Publisher
- Modestum Publishing Ltd
- Published
- 2017-06-19
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 7
- ISSN
- 1305-8215 (ISSN-L)
- 1305-8223
- OpenAlex
- W2665286161
- Cited by
- 8
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2018: 2
- FWCI
- 0.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Semantic Web and Ontologies
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Technology and Assessment
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Library Science and Information Systems
- Keywords
- digital assessment, computer-based testing, relational databases, Resource Description Framework, semantic web, RDF data model, data compatibility, data updating
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review