The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Christ’s Associations: Connecting and Belonging in the Ancient City
Abstract
A groundbreaking investigation of early Christ groups in the ancient Mediterranean As an urban movement, the early groups of Christ followers came into contact with the many small groups in Greek and Roman antiquity. Organized around the workplace, a deity, a diasporic identity, or a neighborhood, these associations gathered in small face-to-face meetings and provided the principal context for cultic and social interactions for their members. Unlike most other groups, however, about which we have data on their rules of membership, financial management, and organizational hierarchy, we have very little information about early Christ groups. Drawing on data about associative practices throughout the ancient world, this innovative study offers new insight into the structure and mission of the early Christ groups. John S. Kloppenborg situates the Christ associations within the broader historical context of the ancient Mediterranean and reveals that they were probably smaller than previously believed and did not have a uniform system of governance, and that the attraction of Christ groups was based more on practice than theological belief.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“People joined associations because they offered a sense of connectivity through relationships with peers and those of a higher social status, those of other ethnicities or the like (Kloppenborg 2019, p. 55).”
From Nomos and the Dispute in Galatians 2: A Case of Conflicting By-Laws (2023) · cites this paper as Kloppenborg 2019, p. 55
In the citing paper
“Each assembly had a set of by-laws (nomoi) that governed the members of the association, including regulations around entrance requirements, the conduct, and nature of meetings, behavior expected at common meals, disciplinary practices, and the financing of the association (Kloppenborg 2019, p. 41).”
From Nomos and the Dispute in Galatians 2: A Case of Conflicting By-Laws (2023) · cites this paper as Kloppenborg 2019, p. 41
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Nomos and the Dispute in Galatians 2: A Case of Conflicting By-Laws
Lavender, J. (2023) · Religions · doi:10.3390/rel14121449 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Kloppenborg, J. S.
- Corresponding author
- Kloppenborg, John S.
- ORCID
- Kloppenborg, John S.
- Venue
- Yale University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Yale University Press
- Published
- 2019-11-26
- OpenAlex
- W4206447333
- Cited by
- 13
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 2.48
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Yale University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Biblical Studies and Interpretation
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Classics › Classical Antiquity Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies
- Keywords
- early Christianity, ancient Mediterranean, small groups, diasporic identity, neighborhood associations, organizational structure, governance, financial management, organizational hierarchy, social interaction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review