Cited by 1,361Artificial Intelligence ApplicationsEthics and Social Impacts of AICybernetics and Technology in Society

Atlas of AI: Power, Politics, and the Planetary Costs of Artificial Intelligence

Crawford, Kate·2021·Yale University Press eBooks

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.12987/9780300252392

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The study's approach under-represents those with limited digital access or literacy, older adults, individuals outside higher education, and non-Western populations whose cultural frameworks for selfhood may differ substantially.

    “Under-represented by this approach are those with limited digital access or literacy, older adults, individuals outside higher education, and non-Western populations whose cultural frameworks for selfhood may differ substantially [50].”
  • AI systems are founded on extraction infrastructures-data taken, labor concealed, and resources devoured.

    “Crawford (2021) reminds us that artificial intelligence systems are founded on extraction infrastructures-data taken, labor concealed, and resources devoured.”
  • AI systems are taught on corpora that replicate dominant publishing patterns, many of which value clear structure and explicit takeaways.

    “As Crawford (2021) points out, AI systems are taught on corpora that replicate dominant publishing patterns, many of which value clear structure and explicit takeaways.”
  • Global supply chains-including extraction of raw materials, manufacturing of semiconductor chips, and disposal of electronic waste-contribute substantially to AI's environmental cost, yet these distributed impacts remain difficult to track.

    “Global supply chains-encompassing the extraction of raw materials, the manufacturing of semiconductor chips, and the disposal of electronic waste-also contribute substantially to AI's environmental cost, yet these distributed impacts remain notoriously difficult to track [24, 83].”
  • Some in HCI research embrace new creative tools to create AI Art, but others are skeptical of the hype from different perspectives, including disturbance of social orders, legality of style appropriation, and potential copyright infringement.

    “Specifically in the field of HCI research, some embrace these new creative tools to create various AI Art, but others are skeptical of the hype from different perspectives [17], including the disturbance of social orders [44], the legality of style appropriation [38], and potential copyright infringement [18].”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

Cited by 1,361

Authors
Crawford, K.
Corresponding author
Crawford, Kate
Venue
Yale University Press eBooks
Published
2021-03-22
OpenAlex
W4205725149
Cited by
1,361
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 587 · 2025: 398 · 2024: 182 · 2023: 119 · 2022: 60 · 2021: 15
FWCI
43.15
Type
book
Language
it
Open access
closed
Locations
Yale University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Cybernetics and Technology in Society
Keywords
artificial intelligence, history of artificial intelligence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review