Port site infection in laparoscopic surgery: a review of its management
Open accessAbstract
Laparoscopic surgery (LS), also termed minimal access surgery, has brought a paradigm shift in the approach to modern surgical care. Early postoperative recovery, less pain, improved aesthesis and early return to work have led to its popularity both amongst surgeons and patients. Its application has progressed from cholecystectomies and appendectomies to various other fields including gastrointestinal surgery, urology, gynecology and oncosurgery. However, LS has its own package of complications. Port site infection (PSI), although infrequent, is one of the bothersome complications which undermine the benefits of minimal invasive surgery. Not only does it add to the morbidity of the patient but also spoils the reputation of the surgeon. Despite the advances in the field of antimicrobial agents, sterilization techniques, surgical techniques, operating room ventilation, PSIs still prevail. The emergence of rapid growing atypical mycobacteria with multidrug resistance, which are the causative organism in most of the cases, has further compounded the problem. PSIs are preventable if appropriate measures are taken preoperatively, intraoperatively and postoperatively. PSIs can often be treated non-surgically, with early identification and appropriate management. Macrolides, quinolones and aminoglycosides antibiotics do show promising activity against the atypical mycobacteria. This review article highlights the clinical burden, presentations and management of PSIs in LS as shared by various authors in the literature. We have given emphasis to atypical mycobacteria, which are emerging as a common etiological agent for PSIs in LS. Although the existing literature lacks consensus regarding PSI management, the complication can be best avoided by strictly abiding by the commandments of sterilization techniques of the laparoscopic instruments with appropriate sterilizing agent.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Infection with atypical mycobacteria is typically restricted to the laparoscopic procedure because most laparoscopic equipment has a heat-sensitive outer insulating sheath.
“Due to the heat-sensitive outer insulating sheath on most laparoscopic equipment, infection with atypical mycobacteria is typically restricted to the laparoscopic procedure [13].”
From Insights Into Laparoscopic Port Site Complications: A Comprehensive Review (2024) · cites this paper as [13]
The most frequent reason for port-site infection with atypical mycobacteria is a breach of the laparoscopic instrument sterilization regimen.
“The most frequent reason for PSI with atypical mycobacteria is a breach of the laparoscopic instrument sterilization regimen.”
From Insights Into Laparoscopic Port Site Complications: A Comprehensive Review (2024) · cites this paper as [13]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 62 · Cited by 100
- Authors
- Sasmal, P. K.
- Affiliations
- All India Institute of Medical Sciences Bhubaneswar (IN)
- Corresponding author
- Sasmal, Prakash K
- ORCID
- Sasmal, Prakash K
- Venue
- World Journal of Clinical Cases
- Publisher
- Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
- Published
- 2015
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 864
- ISSN
- 2307-8960 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC4607803
- OpenAlex
- W2179773426
- Cited by
- 100
- References
- 62
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4
- FWCI
- 1.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc
- Locations
- World Journal of Clinical Cases (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Surgical site infection prevention
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Mycobacterium research and diagnosis
- Keywords
- port site infection, laparoscopic surgery, nontuberculous mycobacteria, multidrug resistance, surgical site infection, infection control, instrument sterilization, antibiotic therapy, macrolides, quinolones, aminoglycosides, postoperative complications
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review