The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Feminist Perspectives in Criminology: Transforming and Transgressing
Abstract
This paper describes the achievements of feminist perspectives in criminology and explores their potential for transforming and transgressing' the criminological enterprise. In particular, the authors focus on the potential for transforming traditional research methodologies. Whilst feminist research methodologies are perhaps closely allied to those adopted by symbolic interactionists, the authors are keen to show how feminist approaches overcome some of the criticisms applied. They are also concerned to examine the validity of knowledge created through feminist perspectives and describe attempts to grapple with the question of how to produce good quality knowledge.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Fear of crime: A review of the literature
Hale, C. (1996) · International Review of Victimology · doi:10.1177/026975809600400201 · Cited by 1,579
Feelings and functions in the fear of crime: Applying a new approach to victimisation insecurity
Gray, E., Jackson, J., & Farrall, S. (2011) · British Journal of Criminology · doi:10.1093/bjc/azq066 · Cited by 235
Green Criminology and Crimes of the Economy: Theory, Research and Praxis
Ruggiero, V., & South, N. (2013) · Critical Criminology · doi:10.1007/s10612-013-9191-6 · Cited by 117
Metadata
- Authors
- Morris, A., & Gelsthorpe, L.
- Venue
- Women & Criminal Justice
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1991-05-07
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 3-26
- ISSN
- 0897-4454 (ISSN-L)
- 1541-0323
- OpenAlex
- W2137846759
- Cited by
- 330
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 27.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
