CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 12Maternal and Perinatal Health InterventionsHealthcare Technology and Patient MonitoringECG Monitoring and Analysis

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

An Assessment of Electronic Fetal Monitoring

Haverkamp, Albert D., Orleans, Miriam·1983·Women & Health
DOI 10.1300/j013v07n03_09
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

No abstract available for this article.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1300/j013v07n03_09

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

See all 12

Metadata

Authors
Haverkamp, A. D., & Orleans, M.
Venue
Women & Health
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
1983-01-25
Volume
7
Issue
3-4
Pages
115-134
ISSN
  • 0363-0242 (ISSN-L)
  • 1541-0331
DOI
10.1300/j013v07n03_09
OpenAlex
W2140011681
Cited by
12
References
0
Citations by year
2017: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
2.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Women & Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Healthcare Technology and Patient Monitoring
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › ECG Monitoring and Analysis
Keywords
fetal heart rate monitoring, labor, intrapartum care, obstetric monitoring
MeSH terms
Female, Fetal Blood, Fetal Death, Fetal Monitoring, Fetus, Heart Rate, Humans, Infant Mortality, Pregnancy, Risk, Uterine Contraction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An Assessment of Electronic Fetal Monitoring. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1300/j013v07n03_09
The paper
Haverkamp, A. D., & Orleans, M. (1983). An Assessment of Electronic Fetal Monitoring. Women & Health. https://doi.org/10.1300/j013v07n03_09