The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Comparison of Medical Records and Prescription Claims Files in Documenting Prescription Medication Therapy
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Prescription claims are valid and reliable sources for gathering medication-related information (54,55).”
From Risk of Dementia Among Elderly Nursing Home Patients Using Paroxetine and Other Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors (2015) · cites this paper as [55]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Continuity of Methylphenidate Treatment for Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder
Marcus, S. C., Wan, G. J., Kemner, J. E., & Olfson, M. (2005) · Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine · doi:10.1001/archpedi.159.6.572 · Cited by 163
Bali, V., Chatterjee, S., Carnahan, R. M., Chen, H., Johnson, M. L., & Aparasu, R. R. (2015) · Psychiatric Services · doi:10.1176/appi.ps.201500011 · Cited by 23
Metadata
- Authors
- Kirking, D.
- Corresponding author
- Kirking, Duane
- Venue
- Journal of Pharmacoepidemiology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1996-06-06
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 3-15
- ISSN
- 0896-6966 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-8582
- OpenAlex
- W2066080245
- Cited by
- 24
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2019: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Pharmacoepidemiology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Medical Coding and Health Information
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
- Keywords
- medical records, medication documentation, data source comparison
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison of Medical Records and Prescription Claims Files in Documenting Prescription Medication Therapy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1300/j055v05n01_02
- The paper
- Kirking, D. (1996). Comparison of Medical Records and Prescription Claims Files in Documenting Prescription Medication Therapy. Journal of Pharmacoepidemiology. https://doi.org/10.1300/j055v05n01_02
