Cited by 331Sustainable Agricultural Systems AnalysisAgriculture, Land Use, Rural DevelopmentAgricultural Innovations and Practices

Conceptual Framework for the Transition from Conventional to Sustainable Agriculture

Hill, Stuart B., MacRae, Rod J.·1996·Journal of Sustainable Agriculture

Abstract

A conceptual framework for assessing strategies to support the transition from conventional to sustainable agriculture is described, and examples from farming and institutional settings are provided.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1300/j064v07n01_07

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 7 · Cited by 331

Authors
Hill, S. B., & MacRae, R. J.
Affiliations
McGill University (CA)
Venue
Journal of Sustainable Agriculture
Published
1996-05
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
81-87
ISSN
  • 1044-0046 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-7578
OpenAlex
W2089482774
Cited by
331
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 10
FWCI
0.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Sustainable Agriculture (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Sustainable Agricultural Systems Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agricultural Innovations and Practices
Keywords
sustainable agriculture, conventional farming, transition strategies, conceptual framework, agricultural institutions, agricultural systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review