The DOI matches its Crossref record; 108 of the 108 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Organic Agriculture
Abstract
Sustained high rates of growth in sales of certified organic products (OPs) in the U.S. and worldwide, averaging 20–25% yr−1 since 1990, have spurred concomitant growth and activities in production, processing, research, regulation and trade agreements, and exports. The global OP market value in 2001 is estimated to be $20B, and the OP share of total food sales is near 2% in the US and 1–5% in EU countries. Processed OPs have shown particularly rapid growth, often over 100% yr−1. Commercial certified organic agriculture (OA) has spread to over 130 countries worldwide. Demand for OPs is driven by belief that OPs are more healthful, tasty, and environmentally friendly than conventional products (CPs). Evidence for these beliefs is reviewed. While many of the health claims for OPs remain unresolved, there is sufficient evidence to give OPs the edge in healthfulness. Comparative research is needed, particularly bioassays on animals and analyses of the functional components of foods (nutraceuticals). OP/CP taste comparisons are often inconclusive. Evidence for significant environmental amelioration via conversion to OA is very substantial-pesticides are virtually eliminated and nutrient pollution substantially reduced loss of biodiversity, wind and water erosion, and fossil fuel use and greenhouse warming potential are all reduced in OA relative to comparable conventional agriculture (CA) systems. The agroecological characteristics of OA are reviewed-weed, invertebrate, disease, and soil fertility management practices. Yield reductions of OA systems relative to CA average 10–15%, however these are generally compensated for by lower input costs and higher gross margins. Large-scale conversion to OA would not result in food shortages and could be accomplished with a reduction in meat consumption. OA systems consistently outperform CA in drought situations, out-yielding CA by up to 100%. Also reviewed are: methodologies for comparing productivity and sustainability of OA/CA; the core concept that OA is a structurally different system than CA; the characteristics, sociology, and practices of US organic farmers and farms; OA's origins, its pioneers, major institutions; international certification standards and the new (2000) USDA National Organic Program Final Rule; institutional and media support for and biases against OA; OA's increased involvement with social accountability and animal ethics.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Nonpoint Pollution of Surface Waters with Phosphorus and Nitrogen
Carpenter, S. R., Caraco, N. F., Correll, D. L., Howarth, R. W., Sharpley, A. N., & Smith, V. H. (1998) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1890/1051-0761(1998)008[0559:nposww]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 6,099
HUMAN ALTERATION OF THE GLOBAL NITROGEN CYCLE: SOURCES AND CONSEQUENCES
Vitousek, P. M., Aber, J. D., Howarth, R. W., Likens, G. E., Matson, P. A., Schindler, D. W., Schlesinger, W. H., & Tilman, D. G. (1997) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1890/1051-0761(1997)007[0737:haotgn]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 5,390
Agricultural Intensification and Ecosystem Properties
Matson, P. A., Parton, W. J., Power, A. G., & Swift, M. J. (1997) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.277.5325.504 · Cited by 3,160
Soil health and sustainability: managing the biotic component of soil quality
Doran, J. W., & Zeiss, M. R. (2000) · Applied Soil Ecology · doi:10.1016/s0929-1393(00)00067-6 · Cited by 1,971
Indian Journal of Medical Research
(2024) · The Indian Journal of Medical Research · doi:10.25259/ijmr · Cited by 1,740
Methods for Assessing Soil Quality
(1997) · SSSA Special Publications · doi:10.2136/sssaspecpub49 · Cited by 1,559
Bossio, D. A., & Scow, K. M. (1998) · Microbial Ecology · doi:10.1007/s002489900082 · Cited by 1,409
Tilman, D. (1999) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.96.11.5995 · Cited by 1,406
Embeddedness and local food systems: notes on two types of direct agricultural market
Hinrichs, C. C. (2000) · Journal of Rural Studies · doi:10.1016/s0743-0167(99)00063-7 · Cited by 1,396
Robertson, G. P., Paul, E. A., & Harwood, R. R. (2000) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.289.5486.1922 · Cited by 1,358
Cited by
Organic agriculture in the twenty-first century
Reganold, J. P., & Wachter, J. M. (2016) · Nature Plants · doi:10.1038/nplants.2015.221 · Cited by 1,765
Gomiero, T., Pimentel, D., & Paoletti, M. G. (2011) · Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences · doi:10.1080/07352689.2011.554355 · Cited by 915
Many shades of gray—The context-dependent performance of organic agriculture
Seufert, V., & Ramankutty, N. (2017) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.1602638 · Cited by 523
Financial competitiveness of organic agriculture on a global scale
Crowder, D. W., & Reganold, J. P. (2015) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1423674112 · Cited by 518
Traditional agriculture: a climate-smart approach for sustainable food production
Singh, R., & Singh, G. S. (2017) · Energy, Ecology and Environment · doi:10.1007/s40974-017-0074-7 · Cited by 365
Metadata
- Authors
- Lotter, D. W.
- Venue
- Journal of Sustainable Agriculture
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2003-04
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 59-128
- ISSN
- 1044-0046 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-7578
- OpenAlex
- W4211256075
- Cited by
- 259
- References
- 108
- FWCI
- 7.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Organic Agriculture. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1300/j064v21n04_06
- The paper
- Lotter, D. W. (2003). Organic Agriculture. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture. https://doi.org/10.1300/j064v21n04_06
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.