The DOI matches its Crossref record; 65 of the 65 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Structural Equation Modeling in Practice: Testing a Theory for Research Use
Abstract
Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) is gaining attention in social work as an analytical method for studying social policy and testing theories for practice. This paper demonstrates a special SEM application to test a theory for research use in the human services. Data from 294 decision-makers in human service organizational units of federal, state, and local governments are used to show the appropriateness of using composites instead of multiple indicators in a SEM model with latent variables. The step-by-step description of a two-stage modeling process is presented. Using a model generation analysis strategy, the results show that a nonrecursive model positing a reciprocal relationship between research use and diffusion could not be confirmed. Instead, a recursive model is uncovered with research use leading to research diffusion. In addition, perceived quality of research, positive interaction between researchers and decision-makers, and transfer intensity of disseminating research results through multiple media, produced direct and indirect effects on research use and diffusion. The limitations and strengths of this study using the special SEM application are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3151312 · Cited by 109,314
Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224378101800104 · Cited by 109,190
Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit
Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1992) · Sociological Methods & Research · doi:10.1177/0049124192021002005 · Cited by 27,200
Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures.
Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.88.3.588 · Cited by 19,023
Structural Equations with Latent Variables.
Clogg, C. C., & Bollen, K. A. (1991) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2072165 · Cited by 17,442
Structural Equations with Latent Variables
Bollen, K. A. (1989) · Wiley series in probability and statistics · doi:10.1002/9781118619179 · Cited by 17,277
Testing Structural Equation Models.
Mueller, C. W., Bollen, K. A., & Long, J. S. (1994) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2074955 · Cited by 14,120
EQS : structural equations program manual
Bentler, P. M. (1989) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 9,669
Experimental Design: Procedures for the Behavioral Sciences
Kirk, R. (2013) · doi:10.4135/9781483384733 · Cited by 8,539
Structural model evaluation and modification: An interval estimation approach
Steiger, J. H. (1990) · Multivariate Behavioral Research · doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr2502_4 · Cited by 7,408
Cited by
Cronin, J. J., Brady, M. K., & Hult, G. T. M. (2000) · Journal of Retailing · doi:10.1016/s0022-4359(00)00028-2 · Cited by 6,398
Yoon, Y., & Uysal, M. (2005) · Tourism Management · doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2003.08.016 · Cited by 3,372
Hedonic and utilitarian motivations for online retail shopping behavior
Childers, T. L., Carr, C. L., Peck, J., & Carson, S. (2001) · Journal of Retailing · doi:10.1016/s0022-4359(01)00056-2 · Cited by 3,219
The Predictive Validity of Multiple-Item versus Single-Item Measures of the Same Constructs
Bergkvist, L., & Rossiter, J. R. (2007) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1509/jmkr.44.2.175 · Cited by 3,107
Baker, J., Parasuraman, A., Grewal, D., & Voss, G. B. (2002) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jmkg.66.2.120.18470 · Cited by 2,257
Metadata
- Authors
- Johnson, K. W.
- Venue
- Journal of Social Service Research
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1999-01
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 3-4
- Pages
- 131-171
- ISSN
- 0148-8376 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-7314
- OpenAlex
- W1833883724
- Cited by
- 592
- References
- 65
- FWCI
- 39.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Structural Equation Modeling in Practice: Testing a Theory for Research Use. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1300/j079v24n03_06
- The paper
- Johnson, K. W. (1999). Structural Equation Modeling in Practice: Testing a Theory for Research Use. Journal of Social Service Research. https://doi.org/10.1300/j079v24n03_06
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.