Cited by 13

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Lesbian Cruising: An Examination of the Concept and Methods

Bullock, Denise·2004·Journal of Homosexuality

Abstract

The concept of cruising has typically focused on gay male activity and, as such, has been narrowly focused and limited. This view has reinforced negative stereotypical images of gay men and has devalued women's more subtle styles and longer-term relationships. This paper argues that lesbians do cruise but also problematizes the definition of cruising in lesbian culture. Utilizing observations and in-depth interviews, I have broadened the definition of cruising to include a range of behavior as evidenced in both the lesbian and gay community. I have developed a typology of cruising, highlighting seven styles based on method, whether the individual approaches or not, intent, and investment.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1300/j082v47n02_01

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The capacity of queer folx to navigate constitutive silences is paralleled by the ability to navigate visibility and invisibility in public spaces, particularly as evidenced by 'cruising' wherein queer folx navigate precarious but coded acts of public disclosure of their sexuality in search of erotic partners.

    “This capacity is paralleled by the ability to navigate visibility and invisibility in public spaces, particularly as evidenced by 'cruising' wherein queer folx navigate precarious but coded acts of public disclosure of their sexuality in search of erotic partners (Bullock 2004;Humphreys 1970;Leap 1999).”

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 24

  1. Achilles Nancy, 1967, Sexual Deviance
  2. Altman Dennis, 1982, The Homosexualization of America, the Americanization of the Homosexual
  3. Bell A. P., 1978, Homosexuals: A Study of Diversity Among Men and Women
  4. Blumenfeld Warren J., 1988, Looking at Gay and Lesbian Life
  5. Blumstein Philip, 1983, American Couples: Money, Work, Sexuality
  6. Faderman Lillian, 1991, Odd Girls and Twilight Lovers: A History of Lesbian Life in Twentieth-Century America
  7. Francoeur Robert T., 1991, A Descriptive Dictionary and Atlas of Sexology
  8. Gagnon John H., 1967, Sexual Deviance
  9. Gagnon John H., 1973, Sexual Conduct: The Social Sources of Human Sexuality
  10. Goffman Erving, 1963, Behavior in Public Places: Notes of the Social Organization of Gatherings
  11. Goffman Erving, 1967, Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Behavior
  12. Gordon Suzanne, 1976, Lonely in America
  13. Hooker Evelyn, 1967, Sexual Deviance
  14. Karlen Arno, 1971, Sexuality and Homosexuality: A New View
  15. Kennedy Elizabeth Lapovsky, 1993, Boots of Leather, Slippers of Gold: The History of a Lesbian Community
  16. Kitaka, 1999, The Lesbian Polyamory Reader: Open Relationships, Non-Monogamy, and Casual Sex
  17. Kotarba Joseph A., 1984, The Sociology of Deviance
  18. Laws Judith Long, 1977, Sexual Scripts: The Social Construction of Female Sexuality
  19. Levine Martin P., 1979, Gay Men: The Sociology of Male Homosexuality
  20. Rose Suzanna, 1996, Preventing Heterosexism and Homophobia
  21. Rubin Gayle, 1984, Pleasure and Danger: Exploring Female Sexuality
  22. Sage Wayne, 1979, Gay Men: The Sociology of Male Homosexuality
  23. Simenauer Jacqueline, 1982, Singles: The New Americans
  24. Wolf Deborah G., 1979, The Lesbian Community, 10.1525/9780520313354 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Bullock, D.
Venue
Journal of Homosexuality
Published
2004-07-13
Volume
47
Issue
2
Pages
1-31
ISSN
  • 0091-8369
  • 1540-3602
Cited by
13
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review