Cited by 23Crop Yield and Soil FertilityAgricultural Science and FertilizationPlant Growth and Agriculture Techniques

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Effect of Nitrogen Dose, Sowing Density and Time of Harvest on Development and Yields of Hemp Cultivar Bialobrzeskie

Grabowska, Lidia, Koziara, Wieslaw·2006·Journal of Natural Fibers

Abstract

Increasing possibilities of hemp utilization has changed requirements for the assortment of hemp raw material and resulted in necessity of precise determination of the level of agronomic factors modifying technological and spinning factors of hemp. This refers especially to nitrogen fertilization, sowing density and harvest time. In most investigations carried out on cultivation of hemp only effect of single agronomic factors on the quality and quantity of hemp yield was tested. Utilization of modern methods of collecting and processing of data allows for a complex investigation of correlation between the environment and agronomic conditions and yields of hemp.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1300/j395v02n04_01

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Research works printed but not linked: 23

  1. Aukema J. J., 1957, Niderlands vlasinstituut, Wageningen, 33
  2. Bocsa I., 1997, Der Hanfanbau
  3. Bytnerowicz H. I., 1968, Konopie
  4. Castellini L., 1962, Hemp, Ciba reviev, 5
  5. Dembinski F., 1975, Konopie
  6. Elandt R., 1964, Statystyka matematyczna w zastosowaniu do doswiadczalnictwa rolniczego
  7. Friederich J. C., 1964, Landbouwvoorlichting, 21, s. 145
  8. Goloborodko P. A., 1994, Sprawocznik konoplewoda
  9. Granhall J., 1945, Odlings och berednings forsok med
  10. Jagmin J., 1946, Uprawa lnu i konopi, Biblioteka Samopomocy Chlopskiej nr 5
  11. Jakobey I., 1965, Novenytermeles, 14, 45
  12. Kazanowski L., 1956, Konopie w: Szczegolowa uprawaroslin PWRiL
  13. Kurhanski M., 1994, Konopie w: Poradnik plantatora lnu i konopi
  14. Lipatow W. I., 1976, wozdelywanie i perwicznaja obrabotka konopli i kenefa, 39, 97
  15. Loch L., 1996, Hanfein alter und neuer nachwachsender Rohstoff in Deutchland
  16. Lubkowski Z., 1968, Metodyka doswiadczalnictwa rolniczego
  17. Rivoira G., 1975, Cellulosa e Carta, 26, 9
  18. Schaaf A., 1966, Ilosciowy i jakosciowy wplyw niektórych czynników uprawowych na konopie
  19. Schober E. J., 1961, Mitteilungen fur die Bastfaserindustrie, 3
  20. Strzelecki A. W., 1973, Uprawa konopi na wlokno i nasiona,
  21. Tobler F., 1957, Handbuch der Pflanzenanatomie
  22. Van der Werf H., 1994, Crop physiology of fiber hemp (Cannabis sativa L.), Doctoral thesis
  23. Walter H., 1976, Strefy roslinnosci, a klimat

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Grabowska, L., & Koziara, W.
Affiliations
Institute of Natural Fibres and Medicinal Plants (PL)
Venue
Journal of Natural Fibers
Published
2006-03-15
Volume
2
Issue
4
Pages
1-17
ISSN
  • 1544-046X (ISSN-L)
  • 1544-0478
OpenAlex
W2143221625
Cited by
23
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2
FWCI
1.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Natural Fibers (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Crop Yield and Soil Fertility
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Agricultural Science and Fertilization
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Plant Growth and Agriculture Techniques
Keywords
hemp cultivation, nitrogen fertilization, seeding rate, harvest time, agronomic factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review