Cited by 27Opioid Use Disorder TreatmentSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesPain Management and Opioid Use

Provider Satisfaction with Office-Based Treatment of Opioid Dependence: A Systematic Review

Becker, William C., Fiellin, David A.·2006·Substance Abuse

Abstract

Purpose: New federal regulations allow for office-based treatment of opioid dependent patients with opioid agonist medication (e.g., buprenorphine). We sought to evaluate the literature on office-based physicians’ acceptance of this practice. Methods: We searched the MEDLINE database for original research examining office-based providers’ acceptance or satisfaction with office-based treatment. Articles included in the analysis met the following criteria: (1) discussed the treatment of patients with substance abuse disorders, (2) focused on the treatment of opioid dependent patients, (3) discussed treatment with opioid agonist therapy, (4) discussed treatment by office-based physicians, (5) presented original research, and (6) provided data examining physician acceptance or satisfaction. Results: Eight studies met the criteria. Their heterogeneity precluded aggregate analysis. Four of 8 studies revealed that providers had a positive perception concerning the efficacy of opioid agonist treatment, 4/8 indicated that providers believed that opioid dependent patients were more complex than others in their practices, and 3/8 studies indicated the need for additional support services. Conclusions: There are few studies of provider satisfaction with office-based treatment of opioid dependence. This literature reveals overall provider acceptance of this practice but highlights the need for support services. Further research, designed to identify the barriers to provider satisfaction with office-based opioid agonist therapy, is needed to ensure that these barriers do not limit expansion of this practice.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1300/j465v26n01_02

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 18 · Cited by 27

Authors
Becker, W. C., & Fiellin, D. A.
Affiliations
Yale University (US)
Venue
Substance Abuse
Published
2006-02
Volume
26
Issue
1
Pages
15-22
ISSN
  • 0889-7077 (ISSN-L)
  • 1547-0164
OpenAlex
W2313635221
Cited by
27
References
18
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2
FWCI
2.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Substance Abuse (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
Keywords
office-based treatment, opioid use disorder, opioid substitution therapy, buprenorphine, provider satisfaction, physician acceptance, addiction treatment, support services, federal regulation
MeSH terms
Ambulatory Care, Attitude of Health Personnel, Buprenorphine, Cooperative Behavior, Humans, Methadone, Opioid-Related Disorders, Narcotics, Patient Care Team, Physician-Patient Relations, Physicians, Family

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review