Colletotrichum gloeosporioides: An Anthracnose Causing Pathogen of Fruits and Vegetables
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Relying on morphology of appressoria and conidiomata conidia dimensions, three biological groups within the C. gloeosporioides complex were determined.
“Relying on morphology of appressoria and conidiomata conidia dimensions, three biological groups within the C. gloeosporioides complex were determined (Sharma and Kulshrestha, 2015).”
From Mango anthracnose disease: the current situation and direction for future research (2023) · cites this paper as Sharma and Kulshrestha, 2015
On the molecular level, phylogenetic relationships in the Colletotrichum spp. have been successfully identified through sequencing in the internal transcribed spacers 1 and 2 (ITS1 and ITS2) regions and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) gene.
“On the molecular level, phylogenetic relationships in the Colletotrichum spp. have been successfully identified through sequencing in the internal transcribed spacers 1 and 2 (ITS1 and ITS2) regions and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogrenase (GAPDH) gene (Sharma and Kulshrestha, 2015; Pardo-De la Hoz et al., 2016).”
From Mango anthracnose disease: the current situation and direction for future research (2023) · cites this paper as Sharma and Kulshrestha, 2015
C. gloeosporioides is typically dormant in the dry season, especially during extremes of temperature, low humidity, and sunlight.
“Colletotrichum gloeosporioides is typically dormant in the dry season, especially during extremes of temperature, low humidity, and sunlight (Sharma and Kulshrestha, 2015).”
From Mango anthracnose disease: the current situation and direction for future research (2023) · cites this paper as Sharma and Kulshrestha, 2015
Optimal growth of C. gloeosporioides is favored at high humidity, pH range of 5.8 to 6.5, and temperature of 25-28°C.
“However, optimal growth of the pathogen is favored at high humidity, pH range of 5.8 to 6.5, and temperature of 25–28°C (Sharma and Kulshrestha, 2015).”
From Mango anthracnose disease: the current situation and direction for future research (2023) · cites this paper as Sharma and Kulshrestha, 2015
The SL's antifungal activity against Colletotrichum gloeosporioides indicates a potential application as a food preservative against post-harvest decays of apple caused by this pathogen.
“In our study, the promising activity against Colletotrichum gloeosporioides indicates a potential application as food preservative against post-harvest decays of apple caused by this pathogen [53].”
From Production, characterization, and antifungal activity of a biosurfactant produced by Rhodotorula babjevae YS3 (2017) · cites this paper as [53]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
Cited by 132
- Authors
- Sharma, M., & Kulshrestha, S.
- ORCID
- Kulshrestha, Saurabh
- Venue
- Biosciences Biotechnology Research Asia
- Published
- 2015-08-30
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 1233-1246
- ISSN
- 0973-1245 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4230973503
- Cited by
- 132
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 3.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Biosciences Biotechnology Research Asia (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Fungal Plant Pathogen Control
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Disease Resistance and Genetics
- Keywords
- Colletotrichum gloeosporioides, anthracnose, plant pathogenic fungi, fruit diseases, vegetable diseases
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review