Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 5Vocational Education and TrainingEducation, Management, Technology, Human ResourcesCorporate Management and Leadership

The DOI matches its DataCite record.

The Future of Aeronautics: 360 Reskilling and Upskilling Approach

Open access
B. AGUIAR, M. PINTO, M. ROSA·2022·Proceedings of the 9th European Conference for Aerospace Sciences. Lille, France, 27 June - 1 July, 2022

Abstract

In the last decade, industries and companies have been dealing with disruptive challenges due to the arrival of Industry 4.0 and market globalization. The COVID-19 pandemic was the last incentive bringing the new industrial revolution to the present moment, and consequently, accelerating transitions to the future of work [1]. In 2030, 375 million workers roughly 14% of the global workforce may need to switch occupational categories due to digitalization, automation and advances in artificial intelligence [2]. This will affect all markets and industries, with a huge impact on sectors, such as the aeronautical industry, specifically where the skills gap is increasing by retirement eligibility waves in the upcoming years. The solution to current and future challenges in the aeronautics sector lay down on shifting traditional learning and development into reskilling and upskilling [3]. Both approaches reflect an individual process of learning: reskilling as learning new skills so that an individual can do a different job and upskilling as a developing process of new skills to increase success in ones current job [3]. According to [1], 40% of workers will need a reskilling training of around six months and 94% of business leaders expect that their employees will upskill themselves on the job in the near future. Not only business micro-leaders are becoming aware of the importance of reskilling and upskilling the workforce, but also macro-leaders, for example, the European Commission, which launched in 2020 the Pact for Skills, a shared engagement model for skills development in Europe, which encourage all stakeholders to develop concrete commitment on reskilling and upskilling the workforce, especially in high-level industries, as the aeronautical sector. Although it is possible to identify an increased awareness about the importance of upskilling and reskilling, how the process can be done remains a question to answer. Among the literature, we cannot find consensus: some authors see it as a responsibility of the industries, others as a responsibility of educational institutes and some others as a responsibility of the workers themselves, to increase their employability. In the present paper, we aim to review each entity role, importance, and possible actions to take and develop a 360 Approach to Reskilling and Upskilling, informed by initiatives such as [4] applied to the aeronautics sector. We propose that the only way to successfully deal with the skills challenge is through the creation of an interconnected action, where the main entities join efforts, act coordinated with each other and take into account other pressing challenges, such as an ageing society/workforce. To upskilling and reskilling in large-scale industry, educational entities and providers, public policymakers and employees need to work in synergy [4]. In conclusion, the present paper aims to present guidelines to a sectorial framework in upskilling and reskilling and bring awareness about the benefits of a joined effort not only to single business growth but also to ensure the present and future prosperity of the Aeronautics in post-covid times. References [1] World Economic Forum, The Future of Jobs Report 2020, World Economic Forum, Geneva, Switzerland (2020) [2] P. Illanes, S. Lund, M. Mourshed, S. Rutherford and M. Tyreman, Retraining and reskilling workers in the age of automation, McKinsey Global Institute (2018) [3] S. Chakma and N. Chaijinda, Importance of reskilling and upskilling the workforce, Interdisciplinary Sripatum Chonburi Journal (ISCJ), 6(2), 23-31 (2020) [4] European Commission, Executive Agency for Small and Medium-sized Enterprises, Schulz, C., Korte, W., Moghaddam, Y., et al., Skills for industry: upskilling and reskilling in the post-covid era: fostering new services and jobs creation: three scenarios for 2030: final report, Publications Office (2021), https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2826/59135

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.13009/eucass2022-4738

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. Roe, R. 2002. What makes a competent psychologist?. European psychologist, 7(3), 192.
  2. Chakma, S. and Chaijinda, N. 2020. Importance of reskilling and upskilling the workforce. Interdisciplinary Sripatum Chonburi Journal. 6(2), 23-31.
  3. Gratton, L. 2021. An Emerging Landscape of Skills for All. The Future of Workplace Learning. MIT Sloan Management Review.
  4. Hall, R. and Lansbury, R. 2006. Skills in Australia: Towards Workforce Development and Sustainable Skill Ecosystems. Journal of Industrial Relations, 48(5), 575-592.
  5. Golfetti, A., Napoletano, L. and Cichomska, K. 2021. A Framework to Understand Current and Future Competences and Occupations in the Aviation Sector. In Transformation of Transportation (pp. 213-226). Springer, Cham.
  6. Ásmundsson, G. 2021. The Times They Are A-Changing: Talent Management for the Future. Master Thesis. Reykjavik University.
  7. Muller, J. 2015. The future of knowledge and skills in science and technology higher education. Higher Education, 70(3), 409-416.
  8. Russell, A. W., Dolnicar, S., and Ayoub, M. 2008. Double degrees: double the trouble or twice the return?. Higher Education, 55(5), 575-591.
  9. Cotet, G. B., Balgiu, B. A., and Zaleschi, V. C. 2017. Assessment procedure for the soft skills requested by Industry 4.0. In MATEC web of conferences (Vol. 121, p. 07005). EDP Sciences.
  10. Tenakwah, E. S. 2021. What do employees want? Halting record-setting turnovers globally. Strategic HR Review.
  11. Schmitz, S., Patient, D., Rosa, M. H., Vauclair, C.-M., and Esteves, C. S. 2021. The other side of the coin: When younger workers are discriminated against. In: International Society for Justice Research 18th biennial conference, Lisbon, Portugal.
  12. Pauwels, L., Chalavi, S., and Swinnen, S. P. 2018. Aging and brain plasticity. Aging, 10(8), 1789.
  13. Noemi N., Fasbender, U., North, M., 2019. Youthfuls, Matures, and Veterans: Subtyping Subjective Age in Late- Career Employees, Work, Aging and Retirement, 5 (4), 307-322.
  14. Weiss, D., Perry, E. L., and Truxillo, D. 2020. Implications of Generational and Age Metastereotypes for Older Adults at Work: The Role of Agency, Stereotype Threat, and Job Search Self-efficacy. Work, Aging and Retirement, 6(1), 15-27.
  15. Simões F, Erdoğan E, Muratović M, Sik D. 2021. Scrutinising the Exceptionalism of Young Rural NEETs: A Bibliometric Review. Youth & Society;54(2_suppl):8S-28S.
  16. Frome, P. M., Alfeld, C. J., Eccles, J. S., and Barber, B. L. 2008. Is the desire for a family-flexible job keeping young women out of male-dominated occupations? In H. M. G. Watt & J. S. Eccles (Eds.), Gender and occupational outcomes: longitudinal assessment of individual, social, and cultural influences. American Psychological Association.
  17. Santos, M. H., Rosa, M., Correia, R., and Xavier E. 2021. Gender roles and dynamics in COVID-19 times: Changes and continuities in sharing arrangements of housework and caregiving. PSICOLOGIA, 35(1), 147-156.
  18. Tatli, A., Özbilgin, M., and Küskü, F. 2008. Gendered occupational outcomes from multilevel perspectives: The case of professional training and work in Turkey. In H. M. G. Watt, and J. S. Eccles (Eds.), Gender and occupational outcomes: longitudinal assessment of individual, social, and cultural influences. American Psychological Association.
  19. Knoke, D., and Ishio, Y. 1998. The Gender Gap in Company Job Training. Work and Occupations, 25(2), 141- 167.

Cited by

See all 5

Metadata

Authors
AGUIAR, B., PINTO, M., & ROSA, M.
Venue
Proceedings of the 9th European Conference for Aerospace Sciences. Lille, France, 27 June - 1 July, 2022
Publisher
Proceedings of the 9th European Conference for Aerospace Sciences. Lille, France, 27 June - 1 July, 2022
Published
2022
OpenAlex
W6884867011
Cited by
5
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2
FWCI
1.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Repositório do ISCTE-IUL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Centre français de recherche aérospatiale - The French Aerospace Lab
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Vocational Education and Training
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Education, Management, Technology, Human Resources
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Corporate Management and Leadership
Keywords
retraining, upskilling, aeronautics industry, skills gap, future of work, Industry 4.0, aging workforce, employability, stakeholder roles, lifelong learning, digitalization and automation, workforce transition, learning and development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Future of Aeronautics: 360 Reskilling and Upskilling Approach. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.13009/eucass2022-4738
The paper
AGUIAR, B., PINTO, M., & ROSA, M. (2022). The Future of Aeronautics: 360 Reskilling and Upskilling Approach. Proceedings of the 9th European Conference for Aerospace Sciences. Lille, France, 27 June - 1 July, 2022. https://doi.org/10.13009/eucass2022-4738

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.