Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 316

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

THE ROLE OF ABDOMINAL PRESSURE IN RELIEVING THE PRESSURE ON THE LUMBAR INTERVERTEBRAL DISCS

Bartelink, D. L.·1957·The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume

Abstract

1. Since the publication by Bradford and Spurling in 1945 of The Intervertebral Disc, there has been argument about the figure of 1,600 pounds that they calculated as the load on each lower lumbar intervertebral disc when a person lifts a heavy load with the trunk flexed, especially since experiments have shown that intervertebral discs subjected to increasing pressures yield at values well below this figure. In the author's experiments the discs were destroyed by pressures ranging from 350 to 1,400 pounds, with a mean of 710 pounds. 2. It occurred to the writer that the spine is not necessarily the only structure in the body that can transmit pressure forces from the shoulder to the pelvis. A raised intra-abdominal pressure impacts a thrust under the diaphragm, which will be transmitted to the thoracic spine and the shoulders by means of the ribs. This thrust can take care of part of the lifted weight and thus decrease the load on the spine. 3. In experiments in which the intra-abdominal pressure was measured by means of a small balloon in the stomach it was found that the pressure rose proportionally with the amount of weight lifted. 4. It is suggested that the abdominal fluid ball can exert a longitudinal force only if there is no contraction of the longitudinal muscles (at least anteriorly). Electromyographic studies of the abdominal muscles during weight lifting showed that the transverse and possibly the oblique abdominal muscles contract, but not the recti. 5. It thus seems that the load on the intervertebral discs is not necessarily so great as Bradford and Spurling calculated, but can remain within safe limits. It is hard to give accurate figures for the amount of load that is taken off the spine in this way, but an estimate would put it at several hundred pounds. The importance of a reflex contraction of the abdominal wall during effort as a protective mechanism for the spine must therefore be appreciated. Voluntary contraction may also be called upon to increase the intra-abdominal pressure and so reduce the load on the discs. This is done by many weight lifters.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1302/0301-620x.39b4.718

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 316

Metadata

Authors
Bartelink, D. L.
Venue
The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume
Published
1957-11
Volume
39-B
Issue
4
Pages
718-725
ISSN
  • 0301-620X (ISSN-L)
  • 2044-5377
OpenAlex
W2299621125
Cited by
316
References
3
FWCI
3.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: THE ROLE OF ABDOMINAL PRESSURE IN RELIEVING THE PRESSURE ON THE LUMBAR INTERVERTEBRAL DISCS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1302/0301-620x.39b4.718
The paper
Bartelink, D. L. (1957). THE ROLE OF ABDOMINAL PRESSURE IN RELIEVING THE PRESSURE ON THE LUMBAR INTERVERTEBRAL DISCS. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.39b4.718

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.