The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
QUESTIONNAIRE ON THE PERCEPTIONS OF PATIENTS ABOUT SHOULDER SURGERY
Abstract
We developed a 12-item questionnaire for completion by patients having shoulder operations other than stabilisation. A prospective study of 111 patients was undertaken before operation and at follow-up six months later. Each patient completed the new questionnaire and the SF36 form. Some filled in the Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ). An orthopaedic surgeon assessed the Constant shoulder score. The single score derived from the questionnaire had a high internal consistency. Reproducibility, examined by test-retest reliability, was found to be satisfactory. The validity of the questionnaire was established by obtaining significant correlations in the expected direction with the Constant score and the relevant scales of the SF36 and the HAQ. Sensitivity to change was assessed by analysing the differences between the preoperative scores and those at follow-up. Changes in scores were compared with the patients’ responses to postoperative questions about their condition. The standardised effect size for the new questionnaire compared favourably with that for the SF36 and the HAQ. The new questionnaire was the most efficient in distinguishing patients who said that their shoulder was much better from all other patients. The shoulder questionnaire provides a measure of outcome for shoulder operations which is short, practical, reliable, valid and sensitive to clinically important changes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT
Martin Bland, J., & Altman, D. (1986) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(86)90837-8 · Cited by 47,965
Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of Tests
Cronbach, L. J. (1951) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02310555 · Cited by 43,931
(1992) · PubMed · Cited by 33,716
A Clinical Method of Functional Assessment of the Shoulder
Constant, C. R., & G. Murley, A. H. (1987) · Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research · doi:10.1097/00003086-198701000-00023 · Cited by 5,300
Effect Sizes for Interpreting Changes in Health Status
Kazis, L. E., Anderson, J. J., & Meenan, R. F. (1989) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/00005650-198903001-00015 · Cited by 2,401
Measuring change over time: Assessing the usefulness of evaluative instruments
Guyatt, G., Walter, S., & Norman, G. (1987) · Journal of Chronic Diseases · doi:10.1016/0021-9681(87)90069-5 · Cited by 1,880
Generic and Disease-Specific Measures in Assessing Health Status and Quality of Life
Patrick, D. L., & Deyo, R. A. (1989) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/00005650-198903001-00018 · Cited by 1,790
The dimensions of health outcomes: the health assessment questionnaire, disability and pain scales.
Fries, J. F., Spitz, P. W., & Young, D. Y. (1982) · PubMed · Cited by 1,318
Quality of life measures in health care. I: Applications and issues in assessment.
Fitzpatrick, R., Fletcher, A., Gore, S., Jones, D., Spiegelhalter, D., & Cox, D. (1992) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.305.6861.1074 · Cited by 694
Self-citationThe Reliability of Clinical Methods, Data and Judgments: (First of Two Parts)
Koran, L. M. (1975) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm197509252931307 · Cited by 649
Cited by
Angst, F., Schwyzer, H., Aeschlimann, A., Simmen, B. R., & Goldhahn, J. (2011) · Arthritis Care & Research · doi:10.1002/acr.20630 · Cited by 592
Rangan, A., Handoll, H., Brealey, S., Jefferson, L., Keding, A., Martin, B. C., Goodchild, L., Chuang, L.-H., Hewitt, C., & Torgerson, D. (2015) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2015.1629 · Cited by 556
Scoring Systems for the Functional Assessment of the Shoulder
Kirkley, A., Griffin, S., & Dainty, K. (2003) · Arthroscopy · doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2003.10.030 · Cited by 504
The Oxford shoulder score revisited
Dawson, J., Rogers, K., Fitzpatrick, R., & Carr, A. (2009) · Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery · doi:10.1007/s00402-007-0549-7 · Cited by 358
Self-citationValidation of the Patient-rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation Questionnaire
Rompe, J. D., Overend, T. J., & MacDermid, J. C. (2007) · Journal of Hand Therapy · doi:10.1197/j.jht.2006.10.003 · Cited by 290
Metadata
- Authors
- Dawson, J., Fitzpatrick, R., & Carr, A.
- Venue
- The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume
- Published
- 1996-07
- Volume
- 78-B
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 593-600
- ISSN
- 0301-620X (ISSN-L)
- 2044-5377
- OpenAlex
- W1891903426
- Cited by
- 717
- References
- 20
- FWCI
- 2.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: QUESTIONNAIRE ON THE PERCEPTIONS OF PATIENTS ABOUT SHOULDER SURGERY. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1302/0301-620x.78b4.0780593
- The paper
- Dawson, J., Fitzpatrick, R., & Carr, A. (1996). QUESTIONNAIRE ON THE PERCEPTIONS OF PATIENTS ABOUT SHOULDER SURGERY. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.78b4.0780593
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.