The DOI matches its OpenAlex record.
Proximal Thigh Pain after Femoral Nailing: Causes and Treatment
Open accessAbstract
We have reviewed retrospectively 80 patients who were treated for traumatic fractures of the femur with a Grosse-Kempf nail to assess the incidence and causes of persisting pain in the proximal thigh. At a mean of 21 months after operation 33 patients had residual pain severe enough to interfere with their lifestyle or mobility. This was in the region of the scar on the greater trochanter in three-quarters of the patients. Only four showed no radiological abnormality. There was nonunion of the fracture in two, Paget's disease in one, breakage of the nail in two and prominence of the proximal locking screw in five, although we found no correlation between prominence of the nail and pain. There was a strong relationship between pain and heterotopic ossification at the proximal end of the implant; this was present in 64% of the patients with pain as compared with those without pain (p < 0.001, Mann-Whitney U test). Of the 80 patients, 27 had the implant removed after 18 months, 17 of them because of pain. In six of these 17, the pain was not relieved. Prominence of the nail proximally was not associated with pain, but protuberance of laterally-based proximal locking screws caused problems. We found a strong association between heterotopic bone formation and pain, but it is uncertain whether this is the true cause or merely an indication of some other factor such as traumatic damage to the glutei during insertion of the nail. Removal of the implant does not always cure such pain.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Oxford shoulder score revisited
Dawson, J., Rogers, K., Fitzpatrick, R., & Carr, A. (2009) · Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery · doi:10.1007/s00402-007-0549-7 · Cited by 358
Hardware Removal: Indications and Expectations
Busam, M. L., Esther, R. J., & Obremskey, W. T. (2006) · Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons · doi:10.5435/00124635-200602000-00006 · Cited by 313
The Penn Shoulder Score: Reliability and validity
Leggin, B. G., Michener, L. A., Shaffer, M. A., Brenneman, S. K., Iannotti, J. P., & Williams, G. R. (2006) · Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy · doi:10.2519/jospt.2006.36.3.138 · Cited by 278
Vermeulen, H. M., Rozing, P. M., Obermann, W. R., le Cessie, S., & Vliet Vlieland, T. P. (2006) · Physical Therapy · doi:10.1093/ptj/86.3.355 · Cited by 276
Metadata
- Authors
- Dodenhoff, R. M., Dainton, J. N., & Hutchins, P. M.
- Venue
- Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume
- Publisher
- British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery
- Published
- 1997-09-01
- Volume
- 79
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 738-741
- ISSN
- 0301-620X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2988455743
- Cited by
- 165
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Proximal Thigh Pain after Femoral Nailing: Causes and Treatment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1302/0301-620x.79b5.7345
- The paper
- Dodenhoff, R. M., Dainton, J. N., & Hutchins, P. M. (1997). Proximal Thigh Pain after Femoral Nailing: Causes and Treatment. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.79b5.7345
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.