The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Predicting dissatisfaction following total knee replacement: A PROSPECTIVE STUDY OF 1217 PATIENTS
Open accessAbstract
Up to 20% of patients are not satisfied with the outcome following total knee replacement (TKR). This study investigated the pre- and post-operative predictors of dissatisfaction in a large cohort of patients undergoing TKR. We assessed 1217 consecutive patients between 2006 and 2008 both before operation and six months after, using the Short-form (SF)-12 health questionnaire and the Oxford Knee Score. Detailed information concerning comorbidity was also gathered. Satisfaction was measured at one year when 18.6% (226 of 1217) of patients were unsure or dissatisfied with their replacement and 81.4% (911 of 1217) were satisfied or very satisfied. Multivariate regression analysis was performed to identify independent predictors of dissatisfaction. Significant (p < 0.001) predictors at one year included the pre-operative SF-12 mental component score, depression and pain in other joints, the six-month SF-12 score and poorer improvement in the pain element of the Oxford Knee Score. Patient expectations were highly correlated with satisfaction. Satisfaction following TKR is multifactorial. Managing the expectations and mental health of the patients may reduce dissatisfaction. However, the most significant predictor of dissatisfaction is a painful total knee replacement.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Psychological factors affecting the outcome of total hip and knee arthroplasty: a systematic review
Vissers, M. M., Bussmann, J. B., Verhaar, J. A. N., Busschbach, J. J. V., Bierma-Zeinstra, S. M. A., & Reijman, M. (2012) · Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism · doi:10.1016/j.semarthrit.2011.07.003 · Cited by 473
Quality of life after total knee arthroplasty
Canovas, F., & Dagneaux, L. (2018) · Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research · doi:10.1016/j.otsr.2017.04.017 · Cited by 470
Pain after knee arthroplasty: an unresolved issue
Grosu, I., Lavand'homme, P., & Thienpont, E. (2014) · Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy · doi:10.1007/s00167-013-2750-2 · Cited by 254
Treatment of central sensitization in patients with ‘unexplained’chronic pain: An update
Nijs, J., Malfliet, A., Ickmans, K., Baert, I., & Meeus, M. (2014) · Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy · doi:10.1517/14656566.2014.925446 · Cited by 195
Sonesson, S., Kvist, J., Ardern, C., Österberg, A., & Silbernagel, K. G. (2017) · Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy · doi:10.1007/s00167-016-4294-8 · Cited by 166
Metadata
- Authors
- Scott, C. E. H., Howie, C. R., MacDonald, D., & Biant, L. C.
- Venue
- The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume
- Published
- 2010-09
- Volume
- 92-B
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1253-1258
- ISSN
- 0301-620X (ISSN-L)
- 2044-5377
- OpenAlex
- W1484989303
- Cited by
- 874
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 24.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Predicting dissatisfaction following total knee replacement: A PROSPECTIVE STUDY OF 1217 PATIENTS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1302/0301-620x.92b9.24394
- The paper
- Scott, C. E. H., Howie, C. R., MacDonald, D., & Biant, L. C. (2010). Predicting dissatisfaction following total knee replacement: A PROSPECTIVE STUDY OF 1217 PATIENTS. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.92b9.24394
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.