Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 496

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

WATERSHED-SCALE HYDROLOGIC AND NONPOINT-SOURCE POLLUTION MODELS: REVIEW OF MATHEMATICAL BASES

D. K. Borah, M. Bera·2003·Transactions of the ASAE

Abstract

A clear understanding of a model is important for its appropriate use. In this article, eleven watershed scalehydrologic and nonpoint-source pollution models are reviewed: AGNPS, AnnAGNPS, ANSWERS, ANSWERS-Continuous,CASC2D, DWSM, HSPF, KINEROS, MIKE SHE, PRMS, and SWAT. AnnAGNPS, ANSWERS-Continuous, HSPF, and SWATare continuous simulation models useful for analyzing long-term effects of hydrological changes and watershed managementpractices, especially agricultural practices. AGNPS, ANSWERS, DWSM, and KINEROS are single rainfall event modelsuseful for analyzing severe actual or design single-event storms and evaluating watershed management practices, especiallystructural practices. CASC2D, MIKE SHE, and PRMS have both long-term and single-event simulation capabilities.Mathematical bases, the most important and critical elements of these mathematical models, were identified and compiled.In this article, a comprehensive summary of the compilation is presented in tabular form. The flow-governing equations andtheir solution methods used in each of the eleven models are discussed. The compilation of the mathematical bases of thesemodels would be useful to determine the problems, situations, or conditions for which the models are most suitable, theaccuracies and uncertainties expected, their full potential uses and limitations, and directions for their enhancements or newdevelopments. AGNPS, AnnAGNPS, DWSM, HSPF, MIKE SHE, and SWAT were found to have all the three major components(hydrology, sediment, and chemical) applicable to watershed-scale catchments. SWAT is a promising model for continuoussimulations in predominantly agricultural watersheds, and HSPF is promising for mixed agricultural and urban watersheds.Among the single-event models, DWSM provides a balance between the simple but approximate and the computationallyintensive models and, therefore, is a promising storm event model for agricultural watersheds.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.13031/2013.15644

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 496

Metadata

Authors
Borah, D. K., & Bera, M.
Venue
Transactions of the ASAE
Published
2003
Volume
46
Issue
6
Pages
1553-1566
ISSN
  • 0001-2351 (ISSN-L)
  • 2151-0059
OpenAlex
W2014477418
Cited by
496
References
1
FWCI
13.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: WATERSHED-SCALE HYDROLOGIC AND NONPOINT-SOURCE POLLUTION MODELS: REVIEW OF MATHEMATICAL BASES. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.13031/2013.15644
The paper
Borah, D. K., & Bera, M. (2003). WATERSHED-SCALE HYDROLOGIC AND NONPOINT-SOURCE POLLUTION MODELS: REVIEW OF MATHEMATICAL BASES. Transactions of the ASAE. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.15644

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.