Cited by 23Irrigation Practices and Water ManagementClimate change impacts on agricultureHydrology and Watershed Management Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

EVALUATION OF THE EPIC MODEL FOR SIMULATING CROP YIELD AND IRRIGATION DEMAND

Abstract

An understanding of water needs in agriculture is a critical input in resolving the water resource issues that confrontmany southeastern states. Unfortunately, how much water is required and how much water is actually being used forirrigation in Georgia is primarily estimated and largely unknown. The objective of this study was to evaluate the performanceof the Environmental Policy Integrated Climate (EPIC) model in simulating crop yield and irrigation demand for three majorcrops in Georgia. Model evaluation is necessary to provide credibility in applying the model for simulating water use by agriculture.Seasonal yield and irrigation data for the 1990 through 2001 crop variety trials conducted at five agricultural experimentstations were used to evaluate simulation of yield and irrigation amount. The root mean squared deviation (RMSD) foryield was 0.29 t/ha for cotton, 0.39 t/ha for soybean, and 1.02 t/ha for peanut. The RMSD for peanut was large because themodel tended to underestimate high yields and was not as sensitive to the factors responsible for the year-to-year variabilityof peanut yield. The RMSD for total amount of irrigation was 75 mm for cotton, 83 mm for soybean, and 87 mm for peanut.The model simulated the mean irrigation amount and the magnitude of annual variability very well. The component of meansquared deviation (MSD = RMSD2) related to the pattern of annual variability in irrigation amount contributed most to MSD.Overall, the results showed that the EPIC…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.13031/2013.17794

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Guerra, L. C., Hoogenboom, G., Boken, V. K., Hook, J. E., Thomas, D. L., & Harrison, K. A.
Venue
Transactions of the ASAE
Published
2004
Volume
47
Issue
6
Pages
2091-2100
ISSN
  • 0001-2351 (ISSN-L)
  • 2151-0059
OpenAlex
W2048651675
Cited by
23
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1
FWCI
4.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Transactions of the ASAE (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Irrigation Practices and Water Management
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Climate change impacts on agriculture
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
Keywords
EPIC model, crop yield simulation, irrigation water demand, agricultural water use, cotton, soybean, groundnut, model evaluation, yield variability, Georgia agriculture, southeastern United States

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review