The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Technical Note: E. coli Transport through Soil Columns: Implications for Bioretention Cell Removal Efficiency
Abstract
Bioretention cells are a developing technology utilizing natural processes to facilitate treatment of surface water during runoff events. In bioretention cells, runoff collects in a shallow depression and percolates through the soil media, eliminating a variety of pollutants ranging from sediment to pathogenic bacteria. A series of column studies was used to evaluate the transport of bacteria through conventional and engineered cell media. The objective was to determine breakthrough concentration curves for the indicator organism Escherichia coli moving through simulated bioretention cell media (coarse sand, loamy sand, and loamy sand with coarse sand plugs), all tested under saturated conditions. Solutions with known concentrations of E. coli were introduced as a continuous source to the lower boundary of the column, and the effluent was analyzed for E. coli. The coarse sand was tested at 7.7 and 2.0 mL/min, where the final effluent concentrations in the higher and lower flow rate experiments were approximately 100% and 80% of the influent concentration, respectively. Final effluent concentrations in experiments with loamy sand at flow rates of 2.0 mL/min were approximately 12% of the influent concentration. However, when sand plugs were added to the loamy sand to improve infiltration capacity, final effluent concentrations increased from 12% without plugs to approximately 65% of the influent concentration with plugs at the same flow rate. Mechanisms of removal were investig…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“possibly due to high infiltration rates minimizing contact time (Garbrecht et al. 2009; Hathaway et al. 2011) or media staying wet for longer periods, allowing bacteria to reproduce prior to sampling (Mahmoud et al. 2019).”
From Green Infrastructure in Series to Treat Stormwater Runoff from a Highway Overpass (2024) · cites this paper as Garbrecht et al. 2009
In the citing paper
“The increase in TC concentration in the bioretention system was consistent with what other studies have found, where coliforms increased from the inlet to the outlet of a bioretention system”
From Green Infrastructure in Series to Treat Stormwater Runoff from a Highway Overpass (2024) · cites this paper as Garbrecht et al. 2009
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Green Infrastructure in Series to Treat Stormwater Runoff from a Highway Overpass
Bodus, B., Branca, J., & McDonald, W. (2024) · Journal of Sustainable Water in the Built Environment · doi:10.1061/jswbay.sweng-569 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Garbrecht, K., Fox, G. A., Guzman, J. A., & Alexander, D.
- Venue
- Transactions of the ASABE
- Published
- 2009
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 481-486
- ISSN
- 2151-0032 (ISSN-L)
- 2151-0040
- OpenAlex
- W2085448596
- Cited by
- 29
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 4.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Transactions of the ASABE (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Oklahoma State University
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Urban Stormwater Management Solutions
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Fecal contamination and water quality
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
- Keywords
- bioretention cells, stormwater runoff treatment, soil columns, coarse sand, loamy sand soil, sand plug, infiltration capacity, breakthrough curves, advection-dispersion modeling, particle size distribution, flow velocity, pathogen removal
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review