Cited by 29Urban Stormwater Management SolutionsFecal contamination and water qualityPharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Technical Note: E. coli Transport through Soil Columns: Implications for Bioretention Cell Removal Efficiency

K. Garbrecht, G. A. Fox, J. A. Guzman, D. Alexander·2009·Transactions of the ASABE

Abstract

Bioretention cells are a developing technology utilizing natural processes to facilitate treatment of surface water during runoff events. In bioretention cells, runoff collects in a shallow depression and percolates through the soil media, eliminating a variety of pollutants ranging from sediment to pathogenic bacteria. A series of column studies was used to evaluate the transport of bacteria through conventional and engineered cell media. The objective was to determine breakthrough concentration curves for the indicator organism Escherichia coli moving through simulated bioretention cell media (coarse sand, loamy sand, and loamy sand with coarse sand plugs), all tested under saturated conditions. Solutions with known concentrations of E. coli were introduced as a continuous source to the lower boundary of the column, and the effluent was analyzed for E. coli. The coarse sand was tested at 7.7 and 2.0 mL/min, where the final effluent concentrations in the higher and lower flow rate experiments were approximately 100% and 80% of the influent concentration, respectively. Final effluent concentrations in experiments with loamy sand at flow rates of 2.0 mL/min were approximately 12% of the influent concentration. However, when sand plugs were added to the loamy sand to improve infiltration capacity, final effluent concentrations increased from 12% without plugs to approximately 65% of the influent concentration with plugs at the same flow rate. Mechanisms of removal were investig…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.13031/2013.26841

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 29

Metadata

Authors
Garbrecht, K., Fox, G. A., Guzman, J. A., & Alexander, D.
Venue
Transactions of the ASABE
Published
2009
Volume
52
Issue
2
Pages
481-486
ISSN
  • 2151-0032 (ISSN-L)
  • 2151-0040
OpenAlex
W2085448596
Cited by
29
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 5
FWCI
4.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Transactions of the ASABE (publishedVersion)
Funders
Oklahoma State University
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Urban Stormwater Management Solutions
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Fecal contamination and water quality
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
Keywords
bioretention cells, stormwater runoff treatment, soil columns, coarse sand, loamy sand soil, sand plug, infiltration capacity, breakthrough curves, advection-dispersion modeling, particle size distribution, flow velocity, pathogen removal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review