Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 168

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Sediment-trapping Effectiveness of Stiff-grass Hedges

L. D. Meyer, S. M. Dabney, W. C. Harmon·1995·Transactions of the ASAE

Abstract

Flume studies showed that narrow hedges of tall, stiff grasses across locations of concentrated overland flow have great potential for retarding runoff and reducing sediment losses. Hedges of switchgrass and vetiver caused backwater depths of up to 400 mm and trapped more than 90% of sediment coarser than 125 mm. Lesser percentages were trapped as sediment size decreased, with only about 20% of the material finer than 32 mm caught. Sediment trapping resulted mostly from upslope ponding by the hedges rather by filtering action, so the physical characteristics of the different grasses were important primarily to the extent that they retarded flow.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.13031/2013.27895

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 168

Metadata

Authors
Meyer, L. D., Dabney, S. M., & Harmon, W. C.
Venue
Transactions of the ASAE
Published
1995
Volume
38
Issue
3
Pages
809-815
ISSN
  • 0001-2351 (ISSN-L)
  • 2151-0059
OpenAlex
W1975922621
Cited by
168
References
0
FWCI
4.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sediment-trapping Effectiveness of Stiff-grass Hedges. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.13031/2013.27895
The paper
Meyer, L. D., Dabney, S. M., & Harmon, W. C. (1995). Sediment-trapping Effectiveness of Stiff-grass Hedges. Transactions of the ASAE. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.27895

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.