The DOI matches its Crossref record.
SPAR—A Soil-Plant-Atmosphere Research System
Abstract
ABSTRACTCOMPREHENSIVE studies of plant dynamics re-quire simultaneous measurements of plant roots and tops in a controlled environment. The objectives of this research were to design, construct, and test a computer-controlled environmental system for studying whole-plant responses. Three independently controlled and monitored sunlit chambers, the Soil-Plant-Atmosphere Research (SPAR) system, were constructed attheUSDA-SEA, Coastal Plains Soil and Water Conservation Re-search Center, Florence, SC. Each SPAR unit is a base steel soil bin, (2 x 0.5 x 1 m) on top of which is an acrylic plastic aerial chamber (1.5 m high), secured and sealed to the base. The temperatures of the aerial chamber and the soil bin can be controlled independently by air-conditioners and heaters. Micrometereological, soil, and plant variables are measured automatically with a micro-processor-based digital data acquisition system. In each chamber, COz can be measured each minute to determine the amount of C02 absorbed by the plant, which must be replaced to maintain a constant C02 level. Apparent net photosynthesis is calculated from C02 measurements and corrected for chamber leakage. The SPAR system was evaluated using cotton to de-termine the potential amount of root dry matter accumu-lation and proliferation in the soil under constant soil matric potential and non-limiting photosynthate supply. Initial results indicated that the SPAR system provides a precisely controlled soil and aerial environment to…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Construction of Soil-Plant-Atmosphere Research facilities at several locations in the southeastern U.S. allowed quantification of cotton physiological, growth, and developmental processes as affected by abiotic stress factors.
“With the construction of Soil-Plant-AtmosphereResearch facilities at several locations in the southeastern U.S. (Phene et al., 1978; Reddy et al., 2001), cotton physiological, growth, and developmental processes as affected by abiotic stress factors were quantified.”
From Development and Application of Process-based Simulation Models for Cotton Production: A Review of Past, Present, and Future Directions (2014) · cites this paper as Phene et al., 1978
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Thorp, K. R., Ale, S., Bange, M. P., Barnes, E. M., Hoogenboom, G., Lascano, R. J., McCarthy, A. C., Nair, S., Paz, J. O., Rajan, N., et al. (2014) · Journal of Cotton Science · doi:10.56454/oovc6073 · Cited by 96
Metadata
- Authors
- Phene, C. J., Baker, D. N., Lambert, J. R., Parsons, J. E., & McKinion, J. M.
- Venue
- Transactions of the ASAE
- Published
- 1978
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 0924-0930
- ISSN
- 0001-2351 (ISSN-L)
- 2151-0059
- OpenAlex
- W1982823192
- Cited by
- 46
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 1.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Transactions of the ASAE (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Soil and Unsaturated Flow
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Irrigation Practices and Water Management
- Keywords
- controlled environment chamber, cotton, net photosynthesis, CO2 flux, matric potential, plant growth rate, environmental control systems, microprocessor-based data acquisition, micrometeorology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review