A Model for Describing Cotton Growth During Emergence
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
By the mid-1970s, fundamental equations were developed to describe cotton growth and development, cotton plant N balance, ET, and soil water balance.
“By the mid-1970s, fundamental equations were developed to describe cotton growth and development (Baker et al., 1972; McKinion et al., 1975; Wanjura et al., 1973), cotton plant N balance (Jones et al., 1974), ET, and soil water balance (Ritchie, 1972; Shirazi et al., 1976).”
From Development and Application of Process-based Simulation Models for Cotton Production: A Review of Past, Present, and Future Directions (2014) · cites this paper as Wanjura et al., 1973
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Thorp, K. R., Ale, S., Bange, M. P., Barnes, E. M., Hoogenboom, G., Lascano, R. J., McCarthy, A. C., Nair, S., Paz, J. O., Rajan, N., et al. (2014) · Journal of Cotton Science · doi:10.56454/oovc6073 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
- Authors
- Wanjura, D. F., Buxton, D. R., & Stapleton, H. I.
- Venue
- Transactions of the ASAE
- Published
- 1973
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 0227-0231
- ISSN
- 0001-2351 (ISSN-L)
- 2151-0059
- OpenAlex
- W2040480137
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2014: 2
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Transactions of the ASAE (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Research in Cotton Cultivation
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Agriculture, Soil, Plant Science
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Leaf Properties and Growth Measurement
- Keywords
- cotton, crop growth simulation, emergence, Gossypium hirsutum
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
