Cited by 19Soil and Water Nutrient DynamicsSoil erosion and sediment transportSoil Management and Crop Yield

Dissolved Nitrogen, Chloride, and Potassium Loss from Fields in Conventional and Conservation Tillage

David Dean Bosch, Thomas L. Potter, Timothy C. Strickland, R. K. Hubbard·2015·Transactions of the ASABE

Abstract

Losses of soluble nutrients from cropland and their transport to surface and groundwater are a continuing water quality concern. In this study, we evaluated tillage impacts on dissolved losses of ammonium (NH4-N), nitrate nitrogen (NO3-N), chloride (Cl), and potassium (K) during rotational cotton and peanut production. Tillage treatments were strip tillage (ST), in which crops were planted into 15 cm strips tilled into cover crop residue mulch, and conventional tillage (CT), in which all crop residues were turned into the soil prior to planting. Winter cover crops were used in both tillage systems. Tillage and irrigation treatments were uniformly applied within two 0.6 ha fields located on a moderately sloping hillslope in the southern Atlantic Coastal Plain region of south-central Georgia. Tile drains were installed at the base of the slope of each field to capture and measure lateral subsurface flow. Each field was subdivided into three 0.2 ha plots, with the three plots making up a single tillage block. H-flumes were used for flow measurement and sample collection. During the five-year study, annual precipitation ranged from 910 to 1488 mm, with an annual average of 1201 mm. Annual surface runoff averaged 17% of annual rainfall from the CT field and 11% from the ST field. Because of relatively low variability in concentrations, surface runoff loads closely tracked surface runoff volumes. Annual surface runoff loadings of NH4-N, NO3-N, and Cl from the ST treatment were foun…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.13031/trans.58.11223

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The higher dissolved N and lower particulate and total N loads in fertilized grassland and cotton/peanut rotations may be attributed to light-textured loamy sands and utilization of winter cover crops in the peanut-cotton rotation studies.

    “This may be attributed to light-textured loamy sands and utilization of winter cover crops in the peanut-cotton rotation studies (Bosch et al. 2015;Endale et al. 2017).”

    From Nutrient Runoff From Agricultural Lands in North American Ecoregions (2025) · cites this paper as Bosch et al. 2015

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bosch, D. D., Potter, T. L., Strickland, T. C., & Hubbard, R. K.
Venue
Transactions of the ASABE
Published
2015-12-30
Volume
58
Issue
6
Pages
1559-1571
ISSN
  • 2151-0032 (ISSN-L)
  • 2151-0040
OpenAlex
W2529819845
Cited by
19
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2015: 1
FWCI
1.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Transactions of the ASABE (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Georgia
  • Agricultural Research Service
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil erosion and sediment transport
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Management and Crop Yield
Keywords
strip tillage, conventional tillage, nitrate-nitrogen loss, chloride loss, potassium excretion, surface runoff, subsurface flow, tile drainage, cotton, groundnut, cover crops, crop residue management, water quality, hillslope hydrology, nitrogen leaching, nitrate leaching

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review