Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 448

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Open or closed geochemical systems during diagenesis in sedimentary basins: Constraints on mass transfer during diagenesis and the prediction of porosity in sandstone and carbonate reservoirs

Bjørlykke, Knut, Jahren, Jens·2012·AAPG Bulletin

Abstract

Abstract Descriptions of mineralogy and textural relationships in sandstones and limestones have been used to establish a sequence of diagenetic events (epigenesis), involving mineral dissolution and precipitation, which have been interpreted to have occurred during the burial history. Published epigenetic sequences commonly imply a geochemically open system with very significant changes in the bulk chemical composition of the sediments during burial. Near-surface diagenetic reactions may be open, involving significant changes in the sediment composition and formation of secondary porosity caused by high pore-water flow rates of meteoric water or reactions with sea water near the sea floor. Calculations show that the bulk chemical composition of the sediments below the reach of high pore-water flow rates of meteoric water or hydrothermal convection should remain nearly constant during progressive burial because of limited pore-water flow. Mass transport between shales and sandstones is also limited because the pore water is, in most cases, buffered by the same minerals so that the concentration gradients are low. Recent studies show that silica released from clay-mineral reactions in mudstones has been precipitated locally as small quartz crystals and not exported to adjacent sandstones. If the geochemical constraints for mass transfer during burial diagenetic reactions are accepted, the chemical reactions involved in diagenesis can be written as balanced equations. This offers the possibility to make predictions about reservoir quality based on assumptions about primary sediment composition related to facies and provenance. Large-scale changes in the bulk composition of sandstones and mudstones during burial diagenesis have been suggested, but because such changes cannot be explained chemically and physically, no predictions can be made. Burial diagenetic processes are, in most cases, not episodic but occur as slow adjustments to increased stress and temperature, driving the sediments toward increased mechanical and thermodynamic stability. As a result, the porosity of a single lithology must decrease during progressive burial, but each lithology has a different porosity curve. This article discusses quantitative calculations and estimates that show clearly that burial diagenesis must represent geochemically nearly closed systems where mineral dissolution and precipitation must be balanced. This provides a theoretical basis for the modeling and prediction of reservoir quality.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1306/04301211139

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 40 references

Cited by

See all 448

Metadata

Authors
Bjørlykke, K., & Jahren, J.
Venue
AAPG Bulletin
Published
2012-12
Volume
96
Issue
12
Pages
2193-2214
ISSN
0149-1423 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2126112415
Cited by
448
References
40
FWCI
11.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Open or closed geochemical systems during diagenesis in sedimentary basins: Constraints on mass transfer during diagenesis and the prediction of porosity in sandstone and carbonate reservoirs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1306/04301211139
The paper
Bjørlykke, K., & Jahren, J. (2012). Open or closed geochemical systems during diagenesis in sedimentary basins: Constraints on mass transfer during diagenesis and the prediction of porosity in sandstone and carbonate reservoirs. AAPG Bulletin. https://doi.org/10.1306/04301211139

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.