The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Open or closed geochemical systems during diagenesis in sedimentary basins: Constraints on mass transfer during diagenesis and the prediction of porosity in sandstone and carbonate reservoirs
Abstract
Abstract Descriptions of mineralogy and textural relationships in sandstones and limestones have been used to establish a sequence of diagenetic events (epigenesis), involving mineral dissolution and precipitation, which have been interpreted to have occurred during the burial history. Published epigenetic sequences commonly imply a geochemically open system with very significant changes in the bulk chemical composition of the sediments during burial. Near-surface diagenetic reactions may be open, involving significant changes in the sediment composition and formation of secondary porosity caused by high pore-water flow rates of meteoric water or reactions with sea water near the sea floor. Calculations show that the bulk chemical composition of the sediments below the reach of high pore-water flow rates of meteoric water or hydrothermal convection should remain nearly constant during progressive burial because of limited pore-water flow. Mass transport between shales and sandstones is also limited because the pore water is, in most cases, buffered by the same minerals so that the concentration gradients are low. Recent studies show that silica released from clay-mineral reactions in mudstones has been precipitated locally as small quartz crystals and not exported to adjacent sandstones. If the geochemical constraints for mass transfer during burial diagenetic reactions are accepted, the chemical reactions involved in diagenesis can be written as balanced equations. This offers the possibility to make predictions about reservoir quality based on assumptions about primary sediment composition related to facies and provenance. Large-scale changes in the bulk composition of sandstones and mudstones during burial diagenesis have been suggested, but because such changes cannot be explained chemically and physically, no predictions can be made. Burial diagenetic processes are, in most cases, not episodic but occur as slow adjustments to increased stress and temperature, driving the sediments toward increased mechanical and thermodynamic stability. As a result, the porosity of a single lithology must decrease during progressive burial, but each lithology has a different porosity curve. This article discusses quantitative calculations and estimates that show clearly that burial diagenesis must represent geochemically nearly closed systems where mineral dissolution and precipitation must be balanced. This provides a theoretical basis for the modeling and prediction of reservoir quality.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Johnson, J. W., Oelkers, E. H., & Helgeson, H. C. (1992) · Computers & Geosciences · doi:10.1016/0098-3004(92)90029-q · Cited by 2,639
Geologic Nomenclature and Classification of Porosity in Sedimentary Carbonates
Philip W. Choquette (2), L. C. P. (1970) · AAPG Bulletin · doi:10.1306/5d25c98b-16c1-11d7-8645000102c1865d · Cited by 1,694
Early Diagenesis: A Theoretical Approach
Berner, R. A. (1980) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9780691209401 · Cited by 1,403
Principles of Sedimentology and Stratigraphy
Boggs, S. (1987) · Cited by 930
Morad, S., Al-Ramadan, K., Ketzer, J. M., & De Ros, L. F. (2010) · AAPG Bulletin · doi:10.1306/04211009178 · Cited by 748
Organic-Inorganic Interactions and Sandstone Diagenesis
Ronald, C. S., Crossey, L. J., Hagen, E. S., & Heasler, H. P. (1989) · AAPG Bulletin · doi:10.1306/703c9ad7-1707-11d7-8645000102c1865d · Cited by 465
Dissolution kinetics of calcite, dolomite and magnesite at 25 °C and 0 to 50 atm pCO2
Pokrovsky, O. S., Golubev, S. V., & Schott, J. (2005) · Chemical Geology · doi:10.1016/j.chemgeo.2004.12.012 · Cited by 423
Practical approaches to identifying sealed and open fractures
Laubach, S. E. (2003) · AAPG Bulletin · doi:10.1306/11060201106 · Cited by 382
Petroleum geoscience: from sedimentary environments to rock physics
(2011) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.48-6300 · Cited by 375
Quartz Cementation in Sedimentary Basins
Bjorlykke, P. K. E. K., & Egeberg, P. K. (1993) · AAPG Bulletin · doi:10.1306/bdff8ee8-1718-11d7-8645000102c1865d · Cited by 360
Cited by
Bjørlykke, K. (2014) · Sedimentary Geology · doi:10.1016/j.sedgeo.2013.12.002 · Cited by 553
Self-citationOn the delimitation of the carbonate burial realm
Immenhauser, A. (2022) · The Depositional Record · doi:10.1002/dep2.173 · Cited by 95
Transformation of protodolomite to dolomite proceeds under dry-heating conditions
Zheng, W., Liu, D., Yang, S., Fan, Q., Papineau, D., Wang, H., Qiu, X., Chang, B., & She, Z. (2021) · Earth and Planetary Science Letters · doi:10.1016/j.epsl.2021.117249 · Cited by 35
Moore, C. H., & Wade, W. J. (2013) · Developments in Sedimentology · doi:10.1016/b978-0-444-53831-4.00010-0 · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Authors
- Bjørlykke, K., & Jahren, J.
- Venue
- AAPG Bulletin
- Published
- 2012-12
- Volume
- 96
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 2193-2214
- ISSN
- 0149-1423 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2126112415
- Cited by
- 448
- References
- 40
- FWCI
- 11.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Open or closed geochemical systems during diagenesis in sedimentary basins: Constraints on mass transfer during diagenesis and the prediction of porosity in sandstone and carbonate reservoirs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1306/04301211139
- The paper
- Bjørlykke, K., & Jahren, J. (2012). Open or closed geochemical systems during diagenesis in sedimentary basins: Constraints on mass transfer during diagenesis and the prediction of porosity in sandstone and carbonate reservoirs. AAPG Bulletin. https://doi.org/10.1306/04301211139
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.