Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 398

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Lithofacies and depositional setting of a highly prospective lacustrine shale oil succession from the Upper Cretaceous Qingshankou Formation in the Gulong sag, northern Songliao Basin, northeast China

Liu, Bo, Wang, Haoli, Fu, Xiaofei, Bai, Yunfeng, Bai, Longhui, Jia, Mengcheng, He, Bo·2019·AAPG Bulletin

Abstract

ABSTRACT The lacustrine shale of the Upper Cretaceous Qingshankou Formation is the principal prospective unconventional target lithology, acting as source, reservoir, and seal. Lithofacies and associated storage capacity are two significant factors in shale oil prospectivity. This paper describes an investigation of the lower Qingshankou Formation lacustrine shale based on detailed description and analysis of cores, shale lithofacies characteristics, depositional setting, and stacking patterns. Seven lithofacies are recognized based on organic matter content, sedimentary structure, and mineralogy, all exhibiting rapid vertical and lateral changes controlled by the depositional setting and basin evolution. An overall trend from shallow-water to deep-water depositional environments is interpreted from the characteristics of the infilling sequences, characterized by increasing total organic carbon (TOC) and total clay content and decreasing layer thickness (i.e., from bedded to laminated then to massive sedimentary structures). Periods of deposition during shallowing cycles show a reverse trend in the sedimentary characteristics described above. The sedimentary rocks in the studied interval show three complete short-term cycles, each one containing progressive and regressive system tracts. Massive siliceous mudstones with both high and moderate TOC are considered to have the best hydrocarbon generation potential. Laminated siliceous mudstones, bedded siltstones, and calcareous mudstones with moderate and low TOC could have the same high hydrocarbon saturations as the high-TOC massive siliceous mudstones, but these lithologies contain more brittle minerals than the massive mudstones. Several siltstone samples show low or zero saturation of in situ hydrocarbons; this is considered to be related to a combination of fair to poor hydrocarbon generation potential and extremely low permeability, limiting migration. Moderate-TOC laminated siliceous mudstones were also observed to have connective pore-fracture networks. It can be demonstrated that successive thick sequences of moderate-TOC laminated siliceous mudstones, showing high volumes of hydrocarbon in situ, a high mineral brittleness index, and good permeability, combine to form shale oil exploration “sweet spots.”

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1306/08031817416

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 31 references

Metadata

Authors
Liu, B., Wang, H., Fu, X., Bai, Y., Bai, L., Jia, M., & He, B.
Venue
AAPG Bulletin
Published
2019-02
Volume
103
Issue
2
Pages
405-432
ISSN
0149-1423 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2890551816
Cited by
398
References
31
FWCI
19.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Lithofacies and depositional setting of a highly prospective lacustrine shale oil succession from the Upper Cretaceous Qingshankou Formation in the Gulong sag, northern Songliao Basin, northeast China. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1306/08031817416
The paper
Liu, B., Wang, H., Fu, X., Bai, Y., Bai, L., Jia, M., & He, B. (2019). Lithofacies and depositional setting of a highly prospective lacustrine shale oil succession from the Upper Cretaceous Qingshankou Formation in the Gulong sag, northern Songliao Basin, northeast China. AAPG Bulletin. https://doi.org/10.1306/08031817416

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.